Hessdalen UFO-documentary, part 2 (with subtitles):

Part two of the Hessdalen UFO-documentary by students from Østfold college.

Hessdalen UFO documentary (with English subtitles):

Here is a Norwegian documentary about Hessdalen made ​​by some students at Østfold College. The film includes interesting comments from Hessdalen residents. I added English subtitles. Part two will come when I get time.

Hessdalen, UFOs and electromagnetic (scalar?) weapons:

In previous articles I have described how the UFO phenomenon in Hessdalen can be divided into different categories, some of which undoubtedly are solid, metallic objects, while others appear as lights in the sky.

And as mentioned in previous articles, -we do not know if "lights in the sky" and solid, metallic objects are two very different phenomena, or whether in fact the same phenomenon is observed under different physical stages. One can for example speculate that these objects are surrounded by ionized gas (plasma) as part of the propulsion (?) and what appears to be lights in the sky, in reality are solid, metallic objects surrounded by ionized air (plasma)?

In some cases, it seems to be a gradual transition from solid objects, to "plasma lights."

From witness statements in Hessdalen:

("... It was surrounded with red smoke", "... the metal had its own" glow "", "... a slightly reddish, glow above", "... you could sort of make out a dark mass in the middle ", etc.)

Other cases indicate that these are two different things: If the "plasma lights" is a kind of unknown natural phenomenon (related to the geophysical conditions in Hessdalen?) it is tempting to speculate whether Hessdalen is selected as the venue for testing of exotic technology ("anti-gravity" aircrafts, etc. .) precisely because of the presence of unknown natural phenomena which can serve as an alibi, cover and camouflage. Or is the "plasma lights" artificial manufactured technology being tested - eg. electromagnetic weapons?

In that case, one can speculate that the solid objects with silvery, metallic hulls, etc., are supervising the technology and manages / controls it?

The latter hypothesis, I have not elaborated further in the past, and can probably seem far fetched to many readers. But through Hessdalen - and through research done by Project Hessdalen we know that the UFO phenomenon is real (not the result of fraud, hallucinations, misinterpretations, etc.), and we also know that the crafts in Hessdalen maneuver in a way that suggests a kind of field propulsion , - in other words a form of manipulation of electromagnetism.

If the technology for electromagnetic propulsion exist (which many observations made in Hessdalen indicates), and it is "our" government behind it (or the power behind the power), it is very natural to assume that the same technology can be used as weapons.

-Take a look at this nice little threat from the Russian politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky:

(2, 15 out of the clip)

[...Vladimir Zhirinovsky is Vice-Chairman of the Russian State Duma and leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), the first officially sanctioned opposition party after the fall of communism. The LDPR has deep links with the former KGB and Communist Party and has become a significant force in Russian politics, despite Zhirinovsky himself being branded as a militant neo-fascist....]

From the clip:

"...New weapons, that noone knows about them yet. With them WE WILL DESTROY any part of the planet within 15 minutes. Not an explosion, not a ray burst, not some kind of a laser, not alightning, no, but a quiet and peaceful weapon.Whole continents will be put to sleep forever. And thats all!

Regarding Zhirinovskys connection with the former KGB and the Communist Party, there is reason to take the statements seriously.

---

...But what exactly are we looking at here?

- An alcoholic political clown serving statements about "new weapons" from thin air, or a well experienced politician - knowing Russian military power – who has a slip of the tounge?

Or does Joseph P. Farrel have a point with his hypothesis about that this is a "message being sent" from Russia?

(Joseph P. Farrels comment)

What Zhirinovskys actually says can be interpreted as that Russia caused Japan-tsunami, and / or that Russia will not hesitate to use the same weapons at the next opportunity!

Zhirinovsky is a Russian politician, but the technology (if real?) is probably widespread and many nations (or the elites who controls them) are probably in possession of this or similar technology.

A possible third world war is unlikely to be fought with bullets and gunpowder.

Hessdalen/Drivdalen UFO-video; proof of solid object?

Forty minutes long recording of UFOs taken in Drivdalen, Norway, a few miles south-west of Hessdalen.

The recording was made 18 January 2001.

To begin with, it is one light. Eventually, two lights - and at the end, we see three lights in a triangle formation.

The most remarkable aspect of the recording, however, is when the light dims, and we apparently can see what is under the luminous surface.

In the beginning we see a bright, color-changing ball:

Later, the "ball" seems to "open" up.

Eventually, the light turns off, and we are able to see that it is a solid object behind the luminous surface.

Let's recap what PhD. astrophysicist MassimoTeodorani have said in this connection:

---

"A fundamental result which was ascertained directly on the field during two intensive
scientific missions, is just that the Hessdalen phenomenology is characterized by two well-
distinguished aspects:

1: luminous orbs for which an external plasma appearance has been ascertained, but with highly anomalous characteristics both thermodynamically and morphologically,

2: a slender but significant minority of objects which possess sharp characteristics of solidity.

This double way in which the learnt phenomenology appears can be interpreted only in two alternative ways:

·       like an overlap of two phenomena with sharply different characteristics,

or

·       like two sharply different behaviours of the same phenomenon.

Anyway it must be reminded that, by assuming that the second option is taken into account, well-known laws of radiation physics say very clearly that the instrumental verification of the plasma nature of a given phenomenon, is not sufficient to demonstrate that the phenomenon is a plasma entirely, but only that his external surface (or: photosphere) behaves like a plasma which, by its
nature, is able to hide all what exists inside it."

--

We can’t see what’s inside a plasma, in the same way as we can’t see what’s inside the sun…

Does this footage represent what's inside a Hessdalen "plasma" ball?

I have been in contact with the head of Project Hessdalen, Erling Strand, at the Østfold university college regarding the recording, and asked for his opinion. He pointed out that we do not know in which hdirection of the sky this was filmed, and that we therefore cann't exclude the possibility that the luminous object at times may have been behind trees or the like. Strand does not exclude, in other words, that the portions of the recording where the light looks like an object, are due to that the light is partially hidden behind a tree.

For this reason, the footage can't prove anything, but in my opinion - and probably anyone who studies it, - it is reasonably unlikely that we are looking at a light (planet?) that periodically moves behind trees here.

Strand emphasizes that the recording is extremely interesting.

French UFO-video from Hessdalen:

I do not speak French, but the film is interesting anyway. The pictures speak for themselves.The film is from 1994, but still just as relevant.

The first time I saw this film, was at the community hall in Hessdalen during "Hessdalen workshop" in 1994, last day, which was open to the public. In every way an interesting evening. At the break of Leif Haviks lecture, we saw the phenomenon from the parking lot outside the community hall.

Residents in Hessdalen makes a convincing job as actors here, I must say!

Hessdalen and UFOs

These days it is 30 years since it seriously broke loose in Hessdalen ...

 Residents in the small mountain village north of Røros in middle Norway have been bullied, ridiculed and harassed, but brave Hessdalen residents nonetheless reaffirmed that what they have seen, they have seen - even though none of them has ever earned a dime or achieved other benefits of it.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWVbhddM7SM&feature=related

To suggest that a whole village have lied and fabricated this story for 30 years is absurd. And that all visitors over the years,  as well as an eventually considerable amount of researchers from home and abroad, should do the same, - that's conspiracy for you!

For those who may wish to further study the topic Hessdalen, I would recommend the book by Leif Havik from 1987:  'UFO phenomenon - is the impossible possible? "And Arne Wisth's book from 1983:" The UFO mystery in Hessdalen. "Both books are unfortunately only available in Norwegian, but I plan to publish translated excerpts here soon.

The most active period in Hessdalen was from autumn 1981 to the spring 1985. At its peak, several UFO sightings were reported daily. In 1984 Project Hessdalen arranged a field survey, and the final report is interesting reading. Observation rate has decreased considerably since the 80's, but still several observations are reported each year .

The same page also has a good collection of articles.

In addition, I recommend the Italian Project Hessdalen page: