As already mentioned,
PhD. astrophysicist Massimo Teodorani related to the Italian branch
of Project Hessdalen, was the leader/coordinator at the three field
studies conducted in Hessdalen in 2000, 2001 and 2002 (project
EMBLA). In this regard, it is published a number of reports and huge
amounts of research data.
The results and
conclusions are startling, and can be summarized in the following
table:
As the table demonstrates, 85% of the observed phenomena
shows (external) plasma characteristics (including 5%
geometric shapes). The remaining 5% of the observed phenomena shows characteristics
of solid, structured objects (and 10 % of uncertain character).
Teodorani explains
the results in this article
---
A fundamental result which
was ascertained directly on the field during two intensive
scientific missions, is just that the Hessdalen phenomenology is
characterized by two well- distinguished aspects:
the very most part of
luminous apparently immaterial orbs for which an external plasma
appearance has been ascertained, but with highly anomalous
characteristics both thermodynamically and morphologically,
a slender but significant
minority of objects which possess sharp characteristics of
solidity.
This double way in which the
learnt phenomenology appears can be interpreted only in two
alternative ways: or like an overlap of two phenomena with
sharply different characteristics, OR like two sharply
different behaviours of the same phenomenon.
Anyway it must be reminded that,
by assuming that the second option is taken into account, well-known
laws of radiation physics say very clearly that the instrumental
verification of the plasma nature of a given phenomenon, is not
sufficient to demonstrate that the phenomenon is a plasma entirely,
but only that his external surface (or: photosphere) behaves
like a plasma which, by its nature, is able to hide all what exists
inside it, as any photon coming from the interior should be
immediately absorbed or scattered by the cloud of ions and electrons
which are located in the external region, which in its turn is the
only one which can be monitored instrumentally. In order to try to
penetrate inside the plasma cloud, during the next missions, an
“imaging radar” is planned for use, together with a
high-resolution spectrograph [1] able to furnish a much more precise
quantitative description of the plasma photosphere of the phenomenon
CONCLUSIVE NOTES
Since the first field-observation in Hessdalen
(EMBLA 2000) it has been possible to learn that, together with a big
majority of lights of the “plasmoid type”, structured
objects were present too: at first a triangle of lights, then
a low-luminosity egg-like translucid object [21]. During the second
field-observation (EMBLA 2001) something similar to a flattened
ellipsoid was recorded [23]. All these specific evidences of
“structured targets” do not demonstrate at all, of course, that
Hessdalen is subject to ET visitation.
On the contrary it is even more reasonable to
suspect that the governments which are at present possibly
experimenting flying devices working with “exotic tecnology”,
would choose locations just like Hessdalen in order to work with no
disturb by putting into practice the best of the camouflages. The
co-existence of anomalous lights of possible natural origin linked to
the territory and of flying machines born from some mind of the
“Skunk Works” might permit to some government to operate in total
secret by letting the public opinion believe that Hessdalen is an
alien basis.
Therefore, the fact that some “structured events”
in Hessdalen were recorded by EMBLA, is not a proof that Earth is
visited by exogenous probes. Nevertheless this possibility in itself,
as a pure work-hypothesis, is not at all excluded by official
science, and it is included inside the plans (introduced before) of
the SETV project. As it has been said, Earth may be reached in
several ways which are canonically accepted. In order that this
possibility may be proved or confuted, it is necessary to expand of
at least an order of magnitude, both the sophistication and the
completenesse of the sensing instrumentation.
[23]
Teodorani
M., Strand E.P. & Hauge B.G. (2001), ‘EMBLA 2001: The Optical
Mission’, ICPH, Articles, http://www.itacomm.net/PH
Here it is worth noting that Teodorani keeps the door open for the
SETV hypothesis (extraterrestrial visitation), but suggests that
secret experiments with exotic technology are a more likely
explanation.
My tip is exotic (man-made)
technology. More on this in later posts.