As I mentioned in the previously published article "Hessdalen as a portal", there are mainly three hypotheses that apply in relation to the UFO phenomenon, - in Hessdalen - AND globally:
1: One currently unknown natural phenomenon, possibly originating in geophysical conditions.
2: Secret military experiments with exotic technology.
3: "Visitation" - in one form or another.
With regard to hypothesis number 1, it is not suited to explain more than a fraction of the observation material - alone. But it cannot be ruled out that several phenomena co-exist in Hessdalen. So that unknown natural phenomena may co-exist with structured, solid objects, ie 'classic' UFOs.
This article should therefore be more about Alternative 3 - whether this can be a form of visitation - in one or another form.
It may be extraterrestrial visitation?
With billions of habitable planets in our own galaxy, there must be trillions of them in the universe. How many of the habitable planets that actually have life, are hard to say (Source: forskning.no).
But the theory that UFOs represents alien intelligence involves a number of assumptions.
Main assumption: That the alien intelligence really exists. For the time being, there is no evidence that races other than us exist. Perhaps an extremely rare combination of events must be necessary to produce intelligent beings? Mankind's development may seem to be the product of a wide range of environmental coincidences - which can occur on any planet - but perhaps not in the right combination or at the right time?
Despite this, it seems that more and more scientists are arguing that it will be naive to assume that we are alone and that it is statistically far more likely that we are not alone.
But if they exist, is it possible for "them" to come here?
J. Allen Hynek has a good illustration of the incredible distances in space:
If you imagine that the thickness of a playing card represents the distance between the earth and the moon, how many cards do you need to reach the nearest star outside the sun? The number is utopian, you need over thirty kilometers of playing cards!
(Hynek in Hessdalen 1985)
But maybe there are "shortcuts"? A type of "hole" in the space-time continuum? Portals etc?
--
J. Allen Hynek in interview with UFO-Norway's Odd Gunnar Røed:
The typical UFO is seen by many, it seems real and leaves marks, and then disappears. It is rarely reported from city to city. When a 747 departs from New York toward San Francisco, it is possible to follow this metal chunk every inch of the journey. This does not apply with UFOs. These occur spontaneously within a confined area, remain visible for a short time, and disappear. Maybe the UFOs have two aspects. They can be something in between our reality and a parallel reality - the door to another dimension? (Source: Tidsskriftet (journal) "UFO" no. 4, 1985).
A while back I came across the book "Demon Haunted" by John Zaffis. One of the chapters in the book deals with portals, and goes as far as to list specific characteristics that, according to the author, are often present in areas of increased paranormal activity - within the UFOlogy often referred to as "window areas" and / or "portals".
Under the section "Geophysical signatures" one can read:
Portals have one or more characteristic geophysical properties. One is marked magnetic deviation. Many portal areas have high concentrations of magnetic or diamagnetic content in the ground, such as iron, magnetite and quartz. Other characteristics include underground water, especially when it comes to the surface, natural caves, tunnels after mining, large bodies of water, especially flowing, and marshy areas.
All in all, this could have been a description of Hessdalen.
Now I do not know what sources Zaffis operates with - he states no one - and possibly this is based entirely on his own experiences and investigations. But it is nevertheless a pretty incredible coincidence whether Hessdalen holds all the hallmarks of a "portal" according to Zaffis if it was based on pure coincidence! While there may be every reason to question the scientific basis of Zaffis' characteristics, such a theory probably does not arise in a vacuum. It must probably be based on something?
And Zaffis isn't the only one to speculate along this line; In the book “Haunted Hudson Valley” by Cheri Revai (2010), one can read:
Investigators in the paranormal believe that specific geological conditions, such as areas with large deposits of iron ore and quartz, can result in increased paranormal activity.
Another book - "Strange Electromagnetic Dimensions: The Science of the Unexplainable" by Louis Proud (2014) - follows the same line:
These phenomena tend to haunt specific locations, places that are geologically "special" in one or more ways, such as being near a fault zone, by large bodies of water, - a lake, pond, river or waterfall - or by significant deposits of minerals.
The mountains in and around Hessdalen have a complex geology - with long traditions for mining. There are many old, abandoned mines in and around the valley, and just south of Hessdalen lies Norway's largest ore deposit - untouched. According to experts, the Hessjøen field is estimated to hold 16 million tons of ore - mainly iron, copper and zinc.
Large ore deposits generate strong magnetic fields.
(Hessdalen, - view to the west: Mount Finnsåhøgda).
In addition, we know that there are significant deposits of quartz crystals in Hessdalen. And precisely crystals are often mentioned in connection with "portals" in paranormal literature - such as e.g. in the book New Realities of the Twenty-First Century, by P. Wildman:
Quartz is known to be piezoelectric, ie, has the property of being electrically charged when pressurized. In combination with strong magnetic fields, this can create a kind of electromagnetic chain reaction at the atomic level, as well as at the subatomic level - electrons, photons, protons and neutrons.
An "electromagnetic chain reaction" is a rather vague description of what is supposed to happen, I think ... But can there be something like that happening in Hessdalen?
Frenchman Jaques Vallée is known in UFO circles for suggesting a multidimensional visitation hypothesis as an alternative to the more widespread - and according to Vallée - narrow - extraterrestrial, visitation hypothesis. Vallée has explored the commonalities between UFO and other paranormal phenomena, including traditional folklore, and speculation on these potential links is presented in Vallé's third UFO book, Passport to Magonia: From Folklore to Flying Saucers (1969).
(Valleé - suggests a multidimensional hypothesis)
Vallée seems to believe that there is a real UFO phenomenon - associated with a form of non-human consciousness - that has been active throughout human history, and seems to mask itself in different forms in different cultures.
American John Keel defies a related view. In his third book - UFOs: Operation Trojan Horse (1970 / re-released in 1996), he links UFOs to supernatural concepts such as monsters, ghosts and demons. Keel uses the term "Ultraterrestrials" to describe the UFO-pilots which he assumes are non-human beings (or intelligence) capable of assuming any form - or rather, giving the illusion of any form.
(John Keel)
--
Do we live in a multidimensional world? Quantum mechanics seem to be open up for this, and more and more physicists seem to be of this opinion. What was pure science fiction just a couple of decades ago seems to be pretty much mainstream today.
Is it that our physical world is just one plane or dimension among many? And is it then possible that the UFO phenomenon - and possibly other paranormal phenomena - is due to the interaction between our own and one or more of these other dimensions?
Is it, after all, all about thin borders? So that there are small "accidents" that cause paranormal events?
A kind of "rift" that constitutes an "opening" between two or more worlds? If so, could it be that Hessdalen in Norway - as well as a number of other similar places around the world - so-called windows - are places where such "rifts" are more likely to emerge?
In the extension of the previous posts - on the question of whether two (or more) separate phenomena coexist in Hessdalen - I would like to focus on what the Norwegian author Willy Ustad has written about "transitional phenomena". In the book 'UFO in Norway' (1997), Ustad divides the UFO-phenomenon into three parts: light phenomena, transitional phenomena and technical objects.
Light phenomena can further be divided into several types:
small moving bright spots in the sky, most often at night or in the dark, but also in daylight
large fireballs that often move at incredible speed, change course abruptly, etc.
minor light phenomena near the ground, either stationary or moving
On transitional phenomena, Ustad writes:
"There is no clear distinction between the latter group and the next group - technical objects. Very often the reports give a clear impression of a technical, or at least physical object inside, or surrounded by a strong light. Very often it is described that a physical object has one or more bright spots, or several bright lights that resemble headlamps."
About the last group, Ustad writes:
Descriptions of objects that are clearly physical are the simplest and most tangible form of reports. Here we also meet a huge variety of the strangest shapes and sizes.
--
Transitional phenomena are, in my opinion, an indication that light phenomena and objects are different sides of the same phenomenon and by going into the report material we can be find cases that underpins this view:
case 1
[...LARS LILLEVOLD and his family live in Hessdalen. - "On January 18, 1982, my life changed completely," he says. "What amazed me so much that I just have to admit that others can laugh at me and look at me like a curl. But I know what I've seen. "
This evening Lars had an errand outside his house. The time was approx. 19:30.
- Over the house I saw something big, glowing red. It must have been at least 30 ~ 4O meters long. It was like a pinch of bread, completely silent. I waited to hear sounds. I listened, but heard only the rush of the forest. Then "it" moved. The light was dazzling. It looked like "it" was emitting a red, fuzzy smoke that it somehow surrounded itself with. It removed in a northerly direction into the valley. I shouted at the wife who saw the lights before "it" disappeared...]
case 2
[..."There's a fire in the cabin!" Was his first thought. He got this idea when he saw a light
near a cabin. But, he immediately saw something else; a
large illuminated object comparable to a Christmas tree with the top facing
down towards the ground. The object stood about four feet above the ground, but it was
difficult to judge this despite - he had the cabin as a reference.
There was a big red light on the front of the object that flashed, and it was a
irregular wooly coating around the entire object. The light from it was so intense that it
was a pain to watch it for a long time...]
case 3
[...Slowly we saw the UFO rise a few meters above the mountain. Now it stood perfectly still. Around it we saw the snow boil as the wind swirled the snowflakes. In the same position, the UFO descended on the mountain. Was it down? The shape was most reminiscent of a pistol bullet. Did I see right? In the moonlight I thought it glistened in metal. Wasn't there a dark silhouette in the intense light?
Suddenly, the UFO turned to the side. It set in motion and "floated" in between Fjellbekkhøgda and Finnsåhøgda. It could not possibly be more than a few meters above the ground where it disappeared out of sight into the mountain...]
-
These reports - which are just three of many - are examples of a smooth transition between light phenomena and crafts and vehicle sightings. Maybe it doesn't make much sense to categorize and make sections?
Phd. in astrophysics, Italian Massimo Teodroani has, as previously mentioned, actively studied Hessdalen, including through three field actions in the 2000s. His conclusion is that the majority of the observed phenomena in Hessdalen have an OUTER plasma signature, but that one cannot "see" what is inside the light (in the same way that one cannot "see" into a star) when available photo equipment is only capable of photographing the outer photo sphere.
In addition, Teodorani states that a smaller - but significant - number of structured solid objects occur in Hessdalen.
As Teodorani says; Light and solid objects can either be the same phenomenon observed in different physical states, or two separate phenomena that coexist.
My examples from the report material on 'transitional phenomena' are, in my view, clear indicators of one and the same phenomenon.
The UFO activity in Hessdalen has a great range, and many have questioned whether there is one single phenomenon present - or if there are two (or more) phenomena that exist side by side.
Project manager Erling Strand has for example. said:
"It's so much different. We get conflicting measurement data. Some point in one direction, while other data point in the opposite direction."
Italian phd. in astrophysics, Teodorani, has said:
"The majority of observed phenomena in Hessdalen have external plasma-like features, while a small number of structured solid objects have been observed. It may be one phenomenon observed under different physical conditions or two separate phenomena coexisting."
Project Hessdalen divides the activity into three categories:
1: Flash. Pointed concentrated flashes of short duration, or powerful flashes that illuminates much of the sky and the surrounding terrain.
2: Yellow and white lights moving around the valley, that can stand still or move at high speeds.
3: Multiple lights together that follow each other as if they were attached to an object. Sometimes something dark / black can be seen between these lights.
From this, one can raise (at least) two hypotheses:
- Flashes and balls of light vs. structured solid objects are separate phenomena where the former must be understood as unknown natural phenomena related to geophysical conditions and combustion processes in the atmosphere - while the latter is a technology - man-made, or related to some form of visitation
Or:
- Flashes, balls of light AND structured solid objects are components of the same technology and constitute a unit.
---
My impression and my claim is that there is support for the view that ALL of the activity are components of the same phenomenon - if you look closely at the report material:
Hessdalen: Three illuminated UFOs:
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1982, AT 6.20pm, one of the residents in Hessdalen saw an oblong luminous object as it flew low over the crest of Finnsåhøgda to the north. In binoculars he could clearly see that there was a red light in the front of the object.
As this object came in a northerly direction, another dull moon colored light appeared in the northeast. It moved on towards the other elongated object, and flashed several times during this journey.
At the same time, a third object, spherical, appeared about 70 degrees above the observer. This also pulsated before it finally went out.
Another person who came driving by car up Hessdalslia hillside saw three luminous objects at the same time as above. (Source: Havik, 87).
Comment: Related to Project Hessdalen's categorisation these are category 2 and 3 together; - balls of light and solid objects (crafts) interact.
Reitan 87; big flashes, balls of light and a craft:
16 October 1987; 7. 20 pm, three adults and a child were traveling by car between Tydal and Reitan
(some 10-15 km east of Hessdalen). On the road between the mountains they initially saw several star-like balls of light passing overhead at a great speed.
The sky was all clear and the wind intermittently gusted up to storm. A few minutes later about 7.20pm, they saw a bright flash of light which illuminated the sky towards Ålen (some 10 km to the NW). The light seemed brightly greenish, and they stopped the car and turned off the lights after another flash had appeared. Each flash lasted for about 3- 4 seconds, with a period of 1 minute between them.
Shortly after the last one, they caught sight of an object which came flying relatively low above the terrain. The object was shaped like a prism, equipped with four legs underneath.
All details were clearly visible; the object coming downwards in front of the car, flying slowly forward, making a brief halt and then disappearing right up into the sky. The observers stated that the object must have been large.
The observation lasted some 30 seconds. All four people felt a certain pressure in their heads both during the observation and shortly afterwards. (This symptom has also been felt by some
other witnesses who have observed UFOs in Hessdalen.) The observers were also a bit frightened and none of them had seen anything similar before. (Source: Nordic UFO Newsletter, 1, 1988).
(A drawing made by the witnesses. The surface looked like glass; shining with a greenish clour.)
Comment: Here all of the categories - 1, 2 and 3 appear together.
Arendal, Norway, 1981; i.e. not from Hessdalen - but very similar to HD sightings:
- Suddenly he became aware of a light in the eastern sky blinking and pulsating fast and irregurlarly. The light moved up and down with a blue blinking, sometimes weak and sometimes very. strong,
and after a little while it disappeared towards the east. Now and then the flashes were so powerful that the ground around the house was lit up as if someone was using a big flashgun out in the woods, far from roads and from any electric outdoor light. They also stated that it did not resemble the distinctive flashes of distant lightning as can be seen in the autumn.
The house is situated on a high spot surrounded by low hills and forests. In front of the house grassy fields run down towards Blagestad. To the northeast there are small islands and hills with low pinetrees. The family now turned off all the lights in the house and sat down behind the windows watching the sky. After an hour of patient waiting, the UFOs appeared again.
Suddenly a shivering yellow light appeared over the southern hills. The object rose and fell and the light shifted from yellow to blue. After a little while, it quickly soared to an altitude of 45 degrees and at the same time another object came in from the northeast and stopped at the same altitude.
Then a huge gray object came in from the south and passed within 50 meters of the house and glided silently towards the lake along the edge of the fields. Over the lake it descended slowly, so it was possible to observe it with the island and pinetrees as a background. The distance was then about 200-300 meters. At both ends they could see a very big red light, and on top of that they claimed there was something like a bridge.
The light from the two red spots was very unfamiliar, and they had difficulties in describing it. (In the southeastern part of the country this cigar-shaped phenomenon had been seen a few years
ago, and then too the witnesses noticed the very odd red lights and eported that there seemed to be something rotating inside them.)
It was a great shock to the family to see this strange, huge UFO with its dark and silent body and clear red lights; They thought for a while that it was an invasion, and turned on the radio for the kind of short message that one would expect to get under such circumstances.
Over the water the cigar changed course and headed slowly towards the northwest, and at the same time the two UFOs on each side of the house started to move; they flew side by side out over the
lake and disappeared behind the islands in the northeast. This led to conclude that the three objects were in contact with each other, moving in a united formation. (Source: Nordic UFO newsletter 2 - 82)
Comment: Again - all three categories are represented at the same time and interact.
---
These are just three selected examples taken from the report material. They are not unique, but on the contrary - rather typical of what has been seen.
These examples do not constitute irrefutable evidence of course, but are a strong indication that the three categories of activity outlined by Project Hessdalen; flash, balls of light and solid, structured objects - must be seen as sub-components within the same overall technology - as part of a unit.
Today's post is from my
point of view, as the author of this blog, a boring post to write,
but hopefully of interest to my readers. I also believe that it is a
very necessary
post. The content is taken from Arne Wisths book from 1983; “The
UFO mystery in Hessdalen” - entirely from chapter nine of the book,
which covers UFO sightings in the Hessdalen area in 1982 - mostly
daylight sightings.
1981 - 1984 was the most intense period in
Hessdalen where it was made several observations per day - up to
thirty a week. From 1985 to the present day it is made (or notified)
a thirty observations on an annual basis.
Some readers probably
wrinkles on the nose of sightings made back in the eighties, and
believes this is old news. I believe, however, it is important to
know about these early sightings and have them as a backdrop when
you read about, and consider recent observations of the type “lights
in the sky”. Internationally Hessdalen is known under the name
"Hessdalen lights." I want to differentiate and create a
more complete picture of what has been observed, and still is being
observed in Hessdalen.
---
Lars Lillevold and his
family live in Hessdalen. - 18 January 1982 changed my life
completely, he says. - What I saw amazed me so that I have to admit
that others may laugh at me and see me as a lunetic. But I know what
I saw.
Illustration; Rune Øverby. "The light was blinding. It looked as if "it" had a red, hairy like smoke that it surrounded itself with."
This evening Lars had an errand outside his
house. The time was approx. 19.30. - Over the outhouse I saw
something big, bright red. It must have been at least 30-40 meters
long. As a loaf of bread it stood there, completely still. I expected
to hear sounds. I listened, but heard only the murmur of the forest.
Then "it" moved. The light was blinding. It looked as if
"it" had a red, hairy like smoke that it surrounded itself
with. It moved in a northerly direction up the valley. He shouted at
his wife who saw the lights before "it" disappeared. -
Since it was a craze for me, I had to see this again. And I have done
many times later. Time and again I asked myself what this might be.
I'm surprised that the authorities do not take this more seriously.
I'm glad that others see, and want as many people as possible to
do.
A man who has seen UFOs both day and night, is Jon Aspås.
In late February, he called his neighbor, Martin Aspås, who lives a
short distance further up the valley. The time was quarter past nine
in the morning. Martin sat and ate breakfast and looked out the
kitchen window when he saw an object in the air just to the south, in
the direction of the houses to Jon Aspås.
Do you see anything
over mount Rogne? Is it the same object that we have seen in the
evening?
Jon ran outside the house. There it was, shiny and
metallic. It was oblong and somewhat flattened below. It looked like
it had a raised platform at the top, says Jon. It went south at an
altitude that could not be more than a few hundred meters.
The
following morning he saw the UFO again. Then it was also observed by
others near Røros. At this second daylight observation, they could
study the object for 42 minutes, as long as it stood quietly in the
valley between Ålen and Hessdalen. Then it went straight east before
it sat up a tremendous speed and disappeared out of sight.
Jon
saw the UFO once again in March. It was passing the valley in
daylight, but very fast. Once it went four times between the valley
and mount Finnsåhøgda, back and forth.
Berit Mary
Kjerrengvold lives in Hessdalen. Tuesday before Easter she was on her
way from Ålen towards Røros in her car. With her she had an
acquaintance, Anita Trygstad from Røros. Approx. at. 13.00 they were
a mile south of Ålen, on a slight incline. On the right side, they
discovered something dark that was not moving over the treetops. The
object appeared elongated and were sort of standing at an angle. It
was metallic silver and quite large. The sun was up, and should
reflect the object's metallic color. It did not, it looked more as if
the metal had its own "glow". They did not stop the car and
saw the object for approx. 20 to 25 seconds. In October, she and her
husband saw a large object with two bright lights in front and a red
at the rear.
"In October, she and her husband saw a large object with two bright lights in front and a red at the rear."
Ingulf Rotan from Ålen have a cabin by Øyungen.
16.03. 1982 approx. at. 19.30 he saw a bright, shiny object coming
through a hole in the clouds. It looked like it came straight from
above, but below the clouds it flattened out after having made a
"spiral movement". It continued to maneuver with strange
turns until it disappeared behind Skarvan.
32 year old Aud
Rønning was 23.03. 1982 approx. at. 22.40 on her way home to
Haltdalen after a trip to Oppdal. Next to the bridge by Gilset she
saw something she thought was the moon. Then she discovered that "the
moon" was elliptical, with a slightly reddish, glow above. It
came from her right over the roadway in front of her. She turned
around. The color was sharp, orange-yellow. Right towards the car the
object came, and Mrs. Rønning was startled for a moment:
Would it drive her
down?
She estimated the
Ufos altitude to be only three or four feet above the ground. She
believed that it may not have been farther than 10-15 feet away when
it suddenly went straight into the air and disappeared. At the same
time, the car engine died out. It lasted just a few seconds, she
says, but the experience is impressed in her mind.
Per Moen
saw "something" in March 1982, at Øyungen. - It was in the
evening, and I saw something I thought was a star among the trees.
It was quiet and it sort of pulsated. Then came a powerful flash that
lit up the whole area, and then it was gone. The object just
disappeared in front of me.
- Another evening, I was at a
similar place to see three of them at once. They came sliding
inwards, two above and one below. Suddenly we saw a fourth object.
Personally, I believe that it came right up from the ground. They
formed a long N-formation. For several minutes I could study them.
Suddenly there was the same as in the first case: they just
disappeared right before my eyes.
During the autumn of 1982, I
have seen similar things several times. One day I drove with my
in-laws north in Hessdalen. They had never seen something, and wanted
to have a look after all the talk about UFOs. Then came a bright
"thing" towards us and turned up the river valley. The
observation lasted for 2-3 minutes. Later, at 23 o'clock, we again
saw it from the "plateau". It came through the clouds,
down sharply at high speed and disappeared behind Finnsåhøgda.
Even
in the bright nights of the summer 1982, there were reports of UFO
sightings. A family from Bærum who were on holiday, have been
unwilling to come forward and tell what they saw in June, when they
were on vacation in Øyungen. But they have revealed to a person that
they saw an enormous flying "thing" that "let out"
three small "things" that flew with tremendous speed. The
family ended their vacation and went home.
8. March 1982
Torbjorn Drag Myrhaug was driving a car into Hessdalen with his wife
Mary and daughter Hallgerd.
The time was 22.50, and suddenly
the family in the car saw an orange colored light to the left of
them. They went out of the car and stood and stared in disbelief at
what played out before them. - The moon reflected in the object, and
we could through the light clearly see that it had a metllic color.
The size was about like a car, and it was pointed in front and
somewhat blunt at the rear. As a ghost plane the object passed
without a sound. In the autumn the whole family was to study a
similar phenomenon from their living room window, and later they have
seen it several times. In August, the daughter Hallgerd with his
grandmother, Ella Hegseth and her friend, Eli Benoa were in a cabin
near Øyungen. Then they saw something that flashed in red, just west
of them. This "red" thing was slowly moving, and they could
observe it for several minutes.
The most remarkable happened
in daylight around 16.30 on 23 October. Tom and Hallgerd was driving
from Hessdalen towards Ålen. The road is very curvy there, and
Torbjorn had to concentrate on driving.
- It was big as an
airplane and silver metallic. No windows I could see where "it"
glided over us, maybe a hundred meters away. It was rather pointed in
front, and right behind I think it sort of was a bump. How long I
saw it, I'm not sure. Maybe a minute. When we finally stopped, it was
gone over the mountain.
Jon Arvid Aspås always spend the
summer on a farm at Hessjøen with his family. It is located on a
hill with good view of the valley. The family consists of his wife
Solfrid, Ole Martin 14 years, Ann Kristin 13, Joar 11 and Sture
10.
Jon Arvid have seen UFOs many times, but only as a light,
except for one occasion when he also claimed to have seen metal and
windows.
The sun was still up at 19.25 o'clock 3 september
1982. The sky was clear, and Jon Arvid and the kids were outside.
Then Solfrid saw something in the sky that came from the south, and
she shouted at the others. - The object was like a fuselage without
wings: Silver - metallic bright in color. (This is confirmed by the
rest of the family). It was probably about. 2 km. Away. - It turned
eastward, and came a bit east of us. It was so close that we could
observe it from underneath. We saw absolutely no wings. It reminded
us of the old airships that we've seen pictures of. No sound was to
hear.
Reconstruction; "The object was like a fuselage without wings: Silver - metallic bright in color."
Jon Arvid ran to fetch his binoculars. As he came back,
the “thing”disappeared into a cloud. - It was not big, says
Solfrid. We wondered that we could not see it coming out of there.
But it was gone.
23. October 1982, ie the same day as Hallgerd
Drag Myrhaug saw "something" from her father's car in broad
daylight, was Edvin Kværnes outside his house in Ålen. It was 16.40
when he over Ålen saw something he thought was an airplane. It went
very slowly on the north course. He studied it carefully. It seemed
much larger than a regular plane, he thought. It was difficult to
judge the height of the craft, but Kværnes son is a pilot, and he
thought it had the same height as his son used to hold over the area.
Maybe around 5000 feet.
Kværnes tried to hear engine sounds from the
plane. He listened. Nothing was to hear. And it went all too slowly.
The plane turned east. But it had no wings! Startled Kværnes studied
the flying object closer. It glistened in a silvery hull, but how
closely he looked, he could not see the wings. As an old-fashioned
airship it slid off. In three - four minutes he observed the object
before it disappeared.
Kværnes was one of those who in
January had seen the UFOs in Hessdalen, the first time north of the
house of Martin Aspås. At that time, they saw it came gliding
silently with two reddish light behind and "some strange light"
in front. They saw the lights in front of the mountain, so it could
not be an airplane. Almost every day after this was Kværnes up on
the "plateau" and from there he made many observations of
unexplained lights.
One autumn day he was at Øyungen along
with seven other people. Then came the UFO he had seen the first time
back - the one with two lights behind. And this time they saw clearly
that it had a light in front. - One of the lights, I think was blue,
says Kværnes. - You could sort of make out a dark mass in the
middle. The UFO moved slowly and disappeared in the north. This
happened at 19.30 o'clock at night, and the weather was fine and
clear. Later, Kværnes saw a UFO once from his car in November.
Ole
O. Baka is from Ålen. Sunday 24 October, he and his son Oddleif were
on a trip in Båttjønndalen along with a colleague, Per Sten Lien.
It was sunny and calm weather. The time could be around 15.45.
Suddenly, they noticed something they thought was a plane on a
northerly course. They saw it glide slowly toward mount
Fjellbekkhøgda, and it shone in the metal as the aircraft turned and
went south in Hessdalen. They saw that it had no wings, and that it
was moving very slowly. The object was shining - and large. The did
not hear any sound.
They agreed that it could not be a plane.
It was more like a helicopter, for it had sort of a thickening in the
middle. But a helicopter is not silent.
Ole Bendheim and his
son Peter was on his way through the valley to Ålen by car on 24.10.
1982. The time was 15.40. They drove around a curve, so Bendheim had
a good grip on the steering wheel. Suddenly he gripped even harder.
What on earth was this? For a moment he thought that what he saw was
a reflection in the window. But no, he saw it through the windshield
and side window. It was a huge object in the sky and it looked like
an aluminum pan in color. It took some time before Peter saw the same
as his father.
Illustration; Rune Øverby. "It must have been twice as big as a truck with a trailer. His son Peter thought it was even bigger. Any plane, it could certainly not be, said Bendheim."
The object was sliding down the mountain and
disappeared for a moment at the forest edge. There it was sort of
hanging over a plantation. It looked as if its length covered the
entire planting area. Bendheim had slowed down, and the car went
forward at snail's pace. Was there no one else nearby who saw this? A
few hours before, there was a swarm of people in the mountains and
valley. Most were hunters, as it was hunting season. Now he saw
none.
- It reminded me of a movie, this that played out over
the treetops in front of us. It seemed so supernatural. Could it be a
mirage? As we could see, was "the thing" only three or four
hundred yards beyond us. It should have been twice as big as a truck
with a trailer. His son Peter thought it was even bigger. Any plane,
it could certainly not be, said Bendheim. The object glided slowly
along. Oblong, silvery, and the front ... there was something that
moved, there?
In front of the object, it looked like it was a
"dent" in the hull. Was it an opening there? Did they see
cross through the object at this point? Was it the woods in the
background they saw? Or was there something inside the vehicle that
moved?
Bendheim've thought and thought about this. - The sight
was so fantastic, so we forgot to study the details, he said. - At
least there were no visible marks on the hull, it was completely
blank. It was just this weird front. No light. No sound to
hear.
Bendheim also believe that it was something that
resembled rods moving in front of the vehicle. They were suddenly
gone. - If we had a camera with us, we would have plenty of time to
shoot. We saw this in seven to eight minutes. Afterwards, I thought
that the word camera was not in our thoughts. Maybe we would not have
taken a picture even if we had been able to. The visual impression
overwhelmed us. We forgot everything.
"Oblong, silvery..."
The object disappeared
behind a hill, and we saw it again. - Had not Peter been with me, I
would not have mentioned this to anyone, said Bendheim. - What should
one really believe? I have no idea what it might have been. Mirage or
... well, I do not know what. The military has been here and asked me
out. I could only say that this was what we saw.
---
This collection of daylight
sightings reports represent only a small excerpt of what was observed in
Hessdalen during the great flap in the 80s. The total number of
observations are enough to fill books - and of a nature (close
range, with the terrain in the background, etc.) that natural
explanations, - like planes etc. can be excluded.
Still it is
done daylight sightings of solid, metallic objects in Hessdalen and
the surrounding area. As previously mentioned in this blog, the
researchers estimate the percentage of solid objects to be somewhere
between 5% (Teodorani) and 15% (Strand). The remaining percentage of
observations are “lights in the sky”.
We do not know if
“lights” and solid objects are two very different phenomena, or
whether in fact the same phenomenon is observed under different
physical stages. One can for example speculate that these objects are
surrounded by ionized gas (plasma) as part of the propulsion (?) and
that what appears to be lights in the sky, in reality are solid,
metallic objects surrounded by ionized air (plasma)?
In some
cases, it seems to be a gradual transition from solid objects, to
"plasma lights". (“...it was surrounded with red
smoke”, “...the metal had its own "glow"”, “... a
slightly reddish, glow above”, “... you could sort of make out a
dark mass in the middle” etc.
Other cases indicate that
these are two different things:
If the "plasma lights"
is a kind of unknown natural phenomenon (related to the geophysical
conditions in Hessdalen?) it is tempting to speculate whether
Hessdalen is selected as the venue for the testing of exotic
technology (“anti-gravity” aircrafts, etc.) precisely because of
the presence of unknown natural phenomena which can serve as an
alibi, cover and camouflage.
Or is the "plasma lights"
artificial manufactured technology being tested - eg. electromagnetic
weapons? In that case, one can speculate that the solid objects with
silvery, metallic hulls, etc., are supervising the technology and
manages / controls it?
What
most people may not know, is that it existed / exists a Nato base
south of Hessdalen at Hummelfjell (1543 m.) (Locally, "Håmmålfjell")
at Os. This was part of NATO's control and warning system created
during the Cold War and was manned until 1986. At the most, the base had
nearly 100 employees.
There is little
information to be found around this, but here you can read a little
(in norwegian).
In addition, it existed /
exists a similar, but smaller, NATO base north of Hessdalen – at
mount Bringen (1042 m.) in Haltdalen.
Here are some pictures of
the plant;
This page provides
information about how it was built huge underground plants in
relation to the NATO bases:
Between Hummelfjell and
Bringen, it is seven miles. Hessdalen is positioned exactly in the
middle between these two stations. From the middle of Hessdalen it is
3,5 miles to Bringen in the north, and 3,5 miles to Hummelfjell in
the south.
From google
earth:
(The
red line shows the direct linear distance from Hummelfjell to
Bringen).
Haviks book (The UFO phenomenon, 1987) describes several times an elongated object with two yellow lights behind, and a little red light in front. Something like this:
This object passed
usually from south to north, through the valley, in front of mount
Finnsåhøgda (seen from Aspåskjølen). It is described that it was
moving with a rolling "wave motion", and in one case there
was described a buzzing / hissing sound from the object, - the
equivalent of high voltage cables in wet weather. The object passed
often at fixed times: one was talking about the "half past seven
flight" and "half past ten flight."
Direction and
altitude (according to the detailed descriptions in Haviks book)
match remarkably well with the calculated linear distance between the
two NATO bases – Bringen and Hummelfjell.
Was this testing of exotic
propulsion? Was it a training "camp" of pilots and personnel to control
these vessels? Or maybe it was patrolling / supervision with the
other "exotic technology" that were/are placed in
Hessdalen?
The other "exotic technology" - in the form
of balls of light, etc. I think probably involves testing /
development / training acc. electronic warfare, and electromagnetic
weapons.
Can Hessdalen be the site of secret experimentation
with "exotic technology" under the control of
NATO?
Observation reports from Hessdalen in many cases
indicate that we are dealing with an exotic form of propulsion. Among
other, it is described non-aerodynamic maneuvers, such as "angle
turns," "stair-like movements" etc. This indicates a
type field propulsion / "anti-gravity."
We are not talking about any
kind of "advanced planes," if someone would think that was
the case.
In a series of posts on
this blog, I have tried to show how there are indications that the
UFO phenomenon can be traced back to Germany and the second world
war. Probably the technology was imported into the United States with
German engineers and scientists through "operation paperclip"
and then disappeard into various black projects.
I have also attempted to
argue that a form of "nuclear propulsion" may be the
"missing link" between conventional propulsion and more
spectacular, electromagnetic, "anti-gravity" propulsion
systems.
It
is not inconceivable that the United States - through NATO – (with
help (?) of Norway) – would want to test this type of technology
on Norwegian soil. Remote mountain areas like Hessdalen would be perfect for this
purpose.
Operation paperclip was
for many years a well-known "conspiracy theory", that probably many
readers of this blog are aware of. After many documents have been
released in recent years, and besides, this 600-page report, it is no longer a theory but conspiracy fact.
However, what is
relatively new, and perhaps not so well known, is the extent
of paperclip. As the report shows, it is not limited to the
recruitment of scientists, but also largely import of Gestapo and SS
personnel, as well as various parts of German intelligence. These
were among others recruited for positions in the OSS, which later
became the CIA.
Here is an article from BBC News which focuses on how Operation Paperclip also
involved import of new technology.
As the report
shows, Paperclip consisted not only of scientists, but also of intelligence
agents and officers, - recruitment of personnel (nearly 10 000 in
number, large and small) and methods.
In addition, - new
and advanced technology.
Paperclip can
probably be related to a lot of what is discussed on different
“conspiracy”-forums, and alternative internet pages. Among
other, the program MK-ULTRA was initiated and implemented by the
imported Nazis.
Obviously,
a dose of Nazi ethics and ideology came along during the importation
of technology and personnel ... . In the aforementioned article
from BBC news: "Supersonic Rockets, nerve gas, jet aircraft, guided missiles, stealth technology and hardened armor, were just some of the ground breaking technologies Developed in Nazi laboratories, workshops and factories, even as Germany was losing the war."
At the bottom of
the article is also mentioned:
«Added to this, the
large number of still-secret Paperclip documents has led many people,
including Nick Cook, Aerospace Consultant at Jane's Defence Weekly,
to speculate that the US may have developed even more advanced Nazi
technology, including anti-gravity devices».
Said Nick Cook
speculates in his book "the hunt for zero point"
regarding the
possibility that recruited Nazi scientists, engineers and technicians
may have had freedom, to such a degree, so that they could have
continued their research quasi-independently, while the officially
was employed and worked for the U.S. military.
Cook speculates whether
they could have "reconstructed" themself as a "state
within a state" - a "black projects coordination office"
within structures that are otherwise under control of the U.S.
government and military.
Perhaps it was
something like this President Eisenhower had in mind when he warned
against the moral and ethical dangers of the military-industrialcomplex's growing influence in American society during his farewell
address in 1961?
This is
demonstrated from a government document entitled "An evaluation
of German Capabilities in 1945" - where foo fighters are known
as "phoo bombs": This technology,
and related technology in the form of "circular wing aircraft"
(which was under development in Nazi Germany), was probably one of
the things one wanted to gain control of, and that may have been
developed in U.S. black projects in the postwar years .
This pictureis something Icame across in adiscussion forum.Unfortunately, I haveno informationaboutwhere the imagecomesfrom, orin whatcontextit was originallypublished.
Nazi rocket program; picture of unknown origin.
However, it seems to displayatable thatdescribesthe Nazirocketprogram duringWorld War II,with detailedinformation on eachmissiletype.
In therightmost column,FliegendeScheibe is described, which translatedfrom Germaninto Englishrepresentsflying saucers.
Based on thedescription (diameter of 42 meters, test flight in1941), it appears that it is the "Habermohl-saucer"we are talkingabout.
Is the imagereal,or arewe talkingabout a hoax?
The detailsin the descriptionsof the otherrocket-typesappear tobe genuineas far as Icansee when Icheck withwikipedia.
But beyondthis it isdifficult to conclude.
I will begratefulfor any commentsthat may contributetoclarification.
Part 1: "The Bell" was probably not a "UFO",
but perhaps an experiment in cutting-edge physics?
It is from
several sources claimed that "The Bell" project had as one
of its aims to examine issues concerning gravity, and potentially
develop fieldpropulsion / "anti-gravity" as a result of
this.
The question then becomes whether any results of "The
Bell" project eventually was used in connection with propulsion
of other SS-initiated "black projects" - such as
saucer-shaped aircrafts (which was originally intended for
conventional jet / rocket propulsion)?
-
The person or persons who leaked / hoaxed (?) "The white hot
intelligence estimate" in 1998, may (most likely) not have
obtained information concerning "The Bell" from Witkowski,
since the information was available only from (at that time)
Witkowskis unknown articles in Polish (the translated version of
"Prawda o Wunderwaffe" - "The truth about the
wunderwaffe" came first in 2003).
- Witkowski wrote about
"The Bell" long before 1998, and could obviously not have picked
info about "The Bell-fuel" from the later MJ-12
document.
- We then have two completely independent
sources on an exotic form of propulsion (which may sound like a form
of fieldpropulsion / "anti-gravity")
- The fact that
Witkowski mentions beryllium oxides
and thorium as
elements in detail in "IRR xerum 525" in his early articles
in Polish, confirms that the MJ-12 document that later mentions the
same elements, is not fake, but real.
- That the MJ-12
document (regardless of Wikowski) mentions beryllium
and thorium as
ingredients in the "fuel" substantiates that Witkowski was
right,, and that "The Bell" experiments actually took
place.
- If the details in the MJ-12 document (that matches
Witkowski) confirms that the technical descriptions in the document
are true, then this is evidence that the Roswell incident actually
took place.
- The technical descriptions in "The White
Hot Intelligence Estimate" suggests that what crashed near
Roswell was an aircraft of German origin:
---
The technical descriptions is
about unusual and sophisticated, but earthly technology: Ignition
Coil, magnets, electrodes, engine, exhaust pipes, plastic, copper
wire, battery and gearbox etc.
This, as mentioned in the
previous Posts.
Happy announcement number 1: The live-camera in the Hessdalen automatic station is up and running again. Here you can
follow what happens in the "valley of UFOs" from second to
second. The live-camera has been down since December, but is finally
back.
Nice view: Hessdalen live-camera.
The camera is very light sensitive, and
mounted in the direction of west. In the hours before sunset,
, the screen goes black, and it is impossible to see
anything. In winter, it is dark at night in Norway, and one
is therefore dependent on the moon for it to be bright enough
to make observations.
However, it is
possible to observe the phenomena live here. I have been
lucky enough to see the phenomena repeatedly using this
camera.
For example, do like me, have a small window
open while you work on something else on your computer, - or
download a screen recording program that can record while you
do something else, not at home, etc.
Hessdalen automatic station.
Happy
announcement number 2: The Project Hessdalen page where
observation reports are published, is updated. So far there are four
phenomena reported in 2012:
---
Date: 01.03.2012 Time: 08:30
P.M Place: Lake Hersjøen, Hessdalen Ole Jacob was
driving a snowmobile on lake Hersjøen, together with his
son Jacob (11 years) and his niece Kristin (13 years). They
saw a green light coming from the east, moving down with an
angle, in front of, and just south of mount Brattbekken, i n
the west. It disappeared when it was in the hillside. It
disappeared when it was below the horizon. The weather was
calm, a few clouds and the themperature was - 2°C.
Date: 25.02.2012 Time: at
about 07:20 P.M Place: Fjellheim parking, Hessdalen The
observers were at the parking place, when they saw a light
in direction northeast. The light wasseen two times during
a 5 minutes periode, and it lasted about 10 seconds each
time. During the first observation, the light split in two.
Date: 19.02.2012 Time: between
01:00 and 02:00 A.M Place: Fjellheim parking, Hessdalen The
observers were at the parking place, in the middle of the
night, due to recording of a film. They saw a light
phenomenon in direction west/northwest, just above mount
Skarvan. They saw the light three times, each with a
duration of about 5 to 10 seconds. It was above the
horizon.
Date: 18.02.2012 Time:11:40
P.M Place: Grøtådalen, Hessdalen Anngerd was sitting on
a sledge behind a snowmobile, when they were driving back
home from Grøtådalen. She saw a light in direction
north/northwest. Estimated distance was to the light was
beneath 1000m, and it was underneath the horizon. The light
looked like sparks/ lines of light / rocket, which was
standing still, just above the ground. She saw the light
just some seconds, because the snowmobile was driving into
the farm, and something did block the line of sight. She
moved to a place on her farm, where she could see it, but
then it was gone.
---
Most reports referred
to in books that deal with the 1947 flying saucer/UFO-wave
describes crafts that indicate
advanced jet / rocket technology. However, there are examples of
other, seemingly more advanced things. Some reports describe
extreme speeds, jerky movements, angle turns (non-aerodynamic
maneuvers) climbing as in "stairs", buzzing sound
(hints of high voltage) craft enveloped in an intense flare,
etc.These reports are characterized by a type of field propulsion
/ "anti-gravity" is involved.
Again Schulgens
memorandum must be mentioned:
“Nuclear propulsion (atomic energy): Atomic energy engines
would probably be unlike any familiar type of engine, altough atomic
engines might be employed in combination with any of the above
types".
The term "nuclear
propulsion" is vague, however. It can mean - and in some
cases, probably, it is
likely that it means - any field-propulsion (or
"anti-gravity") technology that is based on some
form of radioactive isotope to provoke these field
effects.
My tip is that the UFO phenomenon in 1947 was
about a majority of jet-turbine-powered saucer shaped
aircrafts (built in lightweight materials) which
extraordinary maneuverability and performance were based on
eliminating the problem of "the boundary layer" and
thus reduce air resistance and friction. In parallel
with these existed a set of (probably unstable / unreliable)
nuclear-powered vessels, one of which crashed near
Roswell.
The Germans worked to achieve energy
independence in the third Reich,
particularly interesting was alternative "free energy"
sources. According to field propulsion and discussions of
UFOs, Hans Coler and Karl Schappeler are often mentioned,
regarding projects including coils, magnets and rotation.
Hans Colers "Magnetstromapparat".
A
MJ-12 document may shed further light on «coils and
magnets», - and potential nuclear power to provoke field
propulsion («anti-gravity»).
Most
of what is said and written about the so-called Majestic 12
documents (MJ-12) is based on the notion that they are either
100% true or 100% hoax. It has been little focus about
the very nature of them and what they actually say. My
understanding is that some of the documents may contain some
truth mixed with some disinfo. In this context, in my
opinion, "The White Hot Intelligence Estimate" and
especially the second part of the document "technical
evaluation (preliminary)" is particularly
interesting.The following content is taken
directly from the document (quoted from Joseph P. Farrell,
Reich of the black sun (2001) and Roswell and the reich
(2010):
---
PART II TECHNICAL EVALUATION (PRELIMINARY) ULAT-1
1. Upon close examination of the exterior surfaces of the craft's
fuselage, metallurgists found the skin to be of a ferrous metal white
in color. The metal exhibits all the characteristics of high-grade
steel. It was determined that the steel was cold-formed and
heat-treated. Tensile strength was estimated in excess of 150,000
pounds per square inch. Shear tests give the metal a durability
rating about 175,000 pounds per square inch, making the fuselage
extremely strong and heat resistant. 2. Static and pressure flow simulaions were impressive. The
low profile ratio of 6-to-l gives the aerodyne a great advantage
in overcoming the restrictions of the boundary layer effect in
high performance operatons.
...
8. The power plant (seeverely damaged) ???????????????? neutronic
negine. ????????????????? Detected. Heavy water and deuterium
(light hydrogen) elements appear to be the primary ignitor. A series
of coils and heavy magnets connected to the neutronic engine via an
oddly arranged group of electrodes (metal not yet identified) appears
to be the motive force. One small motor was examined. It is encased
in a pure aluminum capsule directly underneath the main engine
compartment. There is a small exhaust aperture that has what can by
(sic) only described as an helicoid mechanism.
...
10: The follwing elements were analyzed and found to exist in
the small neutronic power plant that was found inside ULAT-1:
a. UF6 in metallic form; b. Hydrogen-fluoride gas; c.
Water and uranium tetrafluoride; d. Powdered magnesium and
potassium chlorate; e. Metal similar to lead with a chocolate
brown color; f. U-235 in metallic form; g. Plastic like
material similar to NE 102; h. Beryllium, i. Pure aluminum; h.
Thorium isotope material; j. plutonium powder.
---
Point 1 and 2 is an echo from Schulgens memo, and emphasizes which
was written regarding Nazi research into new forms of production of
metals, as well as research on "boundary layer control".
Section 8 describes a very
unconventional source of energy - composed of conventional elements
but in an unusual combination: A "neutronic power plant"
apparently "powered" by a bizarre mix of everything from
"powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate" to beryllium
and an unknown / unspecified isotope of thorium in a container with
surrounding series of "coils and heavy magnets."
Coils
and magnets are definitely representing "identifiable
electronics", but which is of concern here is an "oddly
arranged group of Electrodes", - in other words; it is not the
technology that is unusual, but the design, arrangement and
combination thereof.
And the description of the
arrangement of the coils, magnets and spherical electronics sounds
suspiciously like Hans Colers "coils" and Schapellers
devices.
The document points, in
other words, not in the direction of alien technology, but exotic,
man-made technology - and further - a unique German
technology.
Point 10 is however the most interesting here.
Remember that this document was published in a publication by Drs.
Robert and Ryan Wood in 1998. Why is this significant? Because the
technological description of this' neutronic power plant "sounds
suspiciously like" the Nazi bell "that used a mysterious"
fuel "code-named" IRR Xerum 525 ". This consisted,
among other things, of thorium and beryllium oxides in addition to
other radioactive materials, which was electromagnetic and mechanical
counter-rotated (american intelligence looking for clues concerning
the German nuclear weapon program found stocks of thorium in massive
quantities when they entered Germany at the end of the war - no one,
today, can explain why the Germans were obsessed of thorium).
Illustration: The Bell (Die Glocke)
The
timing of the publication of the "White Hot Intelligence
Estimate" and its associated documents in 1998, is significant,
because at that time no publication concerning "the Nazi bell"
did exist. The only thing that existed was Igor Witkowskis
(relatively obscure) early articles in Polish language! In other
words, it seems as if "someone" had an extraordinary degree
of "inside knowledge" based on completely different
sources.
It would take too long to go into detail about The
Bell here (I'll save that for later posts), but two of those involved
in the project was Dr. Walter Gerlach, Nobel Prize winner for his
work on spin-polarization in magnetic fields, and specializes in
gravitational physics (and other more obscure topics, such as
"fluorescence of mercury ions in a strong magnetic field",
ie. behavior of a "mercuric plasma") and Dr. Kurt Debus,
electrical engineer with expertise in high voltage and "separation
of magnetic fields" according to Witkowski - and it is from
several sources claimed that the Bell project had - at least as one
of its goals - to investigate aspects concerning gravity, and
potentially develop field propulsion – or anti-gravity - as a
result of this.
How can people (with known
technology) survive the extraordinary acceleration and abrupt
maneuvers UFOs often been observed to exercise - which in some cases
suggest at least 100 times the G-forces? Most people begin to lose
consciousness when approaching 10 to 12 G. ..
This is often
mentioned as a "proof" that UFOs must be extraterrestrial,
which I disagree on. One accepts that aliens are able to solve the
problem of G-forces, but consider it impossible for us? Besides,
it can just as well be remote controlled, unmanned crafts that
carries out the "worst" maneuvers?
My main point is
that UFOs in 1947, according to the majority of the testimonys as
they are reproduced in books that deal with the 47-wave, generally
did not perform maneuvers that suggest that such forces were
involved.
Claims of great maneuverability came later.
Maybe
it's due to:
1: Escalation in the eagerness to describe UFOs
incredible maneuverability from 1947 to the present. 2: A technological
evolution.
Probably a combination, but I think option 2 is
most likely.
During the wave of 1947, UFOs did not perform
these fantastic maneuvers. It was reported amazing maneuverability
compared to contemporary aircraft technology, but not so exotic that
it must represent something extraterrestrial.
ET was obviously
not in the mind of the general Schulgen, nor mentioned in any of the
earliest documents concerning UFOs by the U.S. Air Force - this came
later.
Schulgens memorandum, however, is full of references to German technology and
research conducted in Germany during the war and in the years ahead
of the
war.
http://squib.homestead.com/schulgen.pdf
This
tells me that what was observed in 1947, "looked all too
familiar" two years after the war ended.
This is
especially due to Nazi research on the boundary layer, as well as
research on aircrafts with circular design.
Take a look at the
document from 1936 I linked to in a previous post; - Wilhelm Kinner:
"On wings with circular design" ("Über tragflügel
mit kreisförmigen
grundriss").
But
what about sightings of aliens, some will surely object?
Regarding
close encounters, meetings with aliens etc. I think it's important to
keep in mind that most UFO sightings do not include observation of
pilots / crew.
And in those cases when they are reported to not
look like us, the "gray-aliens" and so on, it is important to
check the source - reports can be manipulated, a manifestation of
disinfo, etc.?
Ps! I do not reject the idea of
extraterrestrial life -, and I am not dismissive of that we may
have had extraterrestrial visits once or several times in our
history. Nevertheless, there are a number of facts that place the
roots of the modern UFO phenomenon, that emerged in 1947, to Germany.
