When I nag about the Majestic-12 documents - even
though they are questionable documents that have been "leaked",
and we do not know the source - it is because I share Joseph P.Farrell's view p. 285
that they possess:
1: An authentic
level, where the technical descriptions of the Roswell wreckage are
summarized. (Here it is a gap between the description of the
technology and what one would expect from the descriptions of a
technology of extraterrestrial origin. Conversely, there exists
detailed parallels between the technology as it is described, and
various "black projects" from Nazi Germany).
2: A
level of disinformation
where the emerging "ET explanation" forms a deep "cover
layer" of disinfo behind the official explanation about a
crashed weather / Project Mogul balloon.
In
this context it is worth mentioning another Majestic 12 document,
«The 16. July 1947 Air Accident Report by General Nathan Twining toHeadquarters».
The MJ-12 document I wrote about in my
previous post, was from September 1947, while this one is from July,
and then immediately after the crashed occurred:
---
1.
As ordered by Presidential directive, dated 9 July 1947, apreliminary
investigation of a recovered "Flying Disc" and remains of a
possible second disc, was conducted by the senior staff of this
command. The data furnished in this report was provided by the
engineering staff personenel of T-2 and aircraft laboratory,
Engineering Division T-3. Additional data was supplied by the
scientific personnel of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CIT and the
Army Air Forces Scientific Advisory Group, headed by Dr. Theodore von
Karman. Further analysis was conducted by personnel from Research and
Development.
2. It is the collective view of this
investigative body, that the aircraft recovered by the Army and Air
Force units near Victorio Peak and Socorro, New Mexico, are not of US
manufacture for the following reasons:
a. The circular
disc-shaped "planform" design does not resemble any design
currently under development by thiscommand nor of any Navy project.
b. The lack of any external propulsion system, power plant,
intake, exhaust either for propeller or jet propulsion, warrants this
view.
c. The inability of the German scientists from Fort
Bliss and White Sands Proving Ground to make a positive
identification of a secret German V weapon out of these discs. Though
thepossibility that the Russians have managed to develop such a
craft, remains. The lack of any markings, ID numbers orinstructions
in Cyrillic, has placed serious doubt in the minds of many, that the
objects recovered are not of Russian manufacture either.
d.
Upon examination of the interior of the craft, a compartment
exhibiting a possible atomic engine was discovered. At least this is
the opinion of Dr. Oppenheimer (sic) and Dr. vonKarman. A possibility
exists that part of the craft itself comprises the propulsion system,
thus allowing the reactor to function as a heat exchanger and
permitting the storage of energy into a substance for later use. This
may allow the converting of mass into energy, unlike the release of
energy of our atomic bombs. The description of the power room is as
follows:
(1) A doughnut shaped tube approximately thirty-five
feet in diameter, made of what appears to be a plastic material,
surrounding a central core (see sketch in Tab 1) This tube was
translucent, approximately one inch this (sic),The tube appeared to
be filled with a large rod centered inside the tube, was wrapped in a
coil of what appears to be copper material, ran through the
circumference of the tube. This may be the reactor control mechanism
or a storage battery. There were no moving parts decernable (sic)
within the power room nor in MISSING LINE HERE.
(2) This
activation of a electrical (sic) potential is believed to be the
primary power to the reactor, though it is only a theory at present.
Just how a heavy water reactor functions in this environment is
unknown.
(3) Underneath the power plant, was discovered a
ballturret, approximately ten feet in diameter. This turret was
encompassed by a series of gears that has a unusual (sic) ratio not
known by any of our engineers. On the underside of the turret were
four circular cavities, coated with some smooth material not
identified. These cavities are symetrical (sic) but seem to be
movable. Just how is not known. The movement of the turret coincides
with the dome-shaped copula compartment above the power room. It is
believed that the main prorpulsion system is a Modeless turbine,
similar to current development now underway at AMC and the Mogul
Project. A possible theory was devised by Dr. August Steinhof, Dr.
Wernher von Braun (sic) and Dr. Theodore von Karman as the craft
moves through the air, it somehow draws the oxygen from the
atomsphere and by a (sic, et passim) induction process, generates a
atomic fusion reaction (see TAB 2). The air outside the craft would
thus be ionized, thus propelling the craft forward. Coupled with the
circular air foil for lift, the craft would presumably have an
unlimited range and air speed This may account for the reported
absence of any noise and the apparent blue flame often associated
with rapid acceleration.
(4) On the Deck of the power room
there are what resembles typewriter keys, possibly reactor/powerplant
controls. There were no conventional electronics not (sic) wiring to
be seen connecting these controls to the propulsion turret.
e.
There is a flight deck located inside the copula section. It is round
and domed at the top. The absence of canopy, observation
windows/blisters, or any optical projection, lends support to the
opinion that this craft is either guided by remote viewing or is
remotely controlled.
(1) A semi-circular photo-tube array
(possibly television).
(2) Crew compartments were
hermetically sealed via a solidification process.
(3) No weld
marks, rivets or soldered joints.
(4) Craft components appear
to be molded and pressed into perfect fit.
---
Some
key points:
If the craft was of
extraterrestrial origin - full of ultra-advanced ET technology - why
were the three German (paperclip) rocket scientists called in to
inspect the wreck? Thinking of U.S. secret projects' potential gain,
- it would probably have been of interest to shield any ET technology from the Germans (and their possible contacts) two years
after the war ended? So in other words, when the Germans were called
in to inspect the remainings of the craft ( possible identification)
it may be taken as an indication that the technology seemed man-made
and of German origin?
Although the Germans were unable to
identify the technology as something associated with German
V-weapons, they were able to propose a rather radical form of
propultion mechanism for the craft, and
consequently they must at least have had some suspicions about its
origin?
Nearly all technological descriptions in the document
has an "man-made" character, a plastic tube, ca. 2.5 cm. in
diameter, filled with a substance that seems to be ... water, a coil
... copper material ...
Furthermore, there is
talk of a heavy water reactor, and that the German paperclip
scientists already are thinking of a nuclear fusion reactor rather
than a fission reactor. Thinking of the equipment described, it seems
a process something like cold fusion(!).
Something resembling
typewriter keys are mentioned in connection with the description of a
possible "power plant" control, and further a "ball
turret" componenet is mentioned, accompanied by a series of
gears (!) With an "unusual ratio", unknown to the Americans
.
All in all, there is very little in "the air accident
report" document that suggests something extraterrestrial, but
rather very much pointing in the direction of technology that the
Nazis tried to perfect during the war.
As mentioned
previously, - General Sculgen and his intelligence agents speculated
about the possibility of nuclear propulsion, - in other words
nuclear-powered
UFOs in 1947.
The paperclip experts, Steinhof, Von Braun and
Karman, describes a type of propulsion where oxygen from the
atmosphere is drawn into the craft when it moves through the air, and
also a process in which a nuclear fusion reaction is formed, so that
the air outside the craft is ionized and thus drives the vessel
forward.
As previously mentioned, it is my opinion that the
term nuclear-propulsion is similar to field propulsion
(“anti-gravity”) when the technology is based on a radioactive
isotope to provoke these field effects.
In
conclusion;
It may appear that both
the official government documents - which of course are undoubtedly
authentic, (represented here by Schulgens collection of intelligence
memorandum) - and also the more dubious Majestic 12 documents - which
probably contains a bit of authentic information mixed with a portion
disinfo - largely supports the claim that the UFO phenomenon is of
German origin.
If any independent Nazi "black project
research team(s)" survived the war, and if the Roswell crash
provide adequate evidence that such was the case, one can hardly
imagine the shock waves in the Pentagon two years after the war ended
...
As Nick Cook puts it in his book "The Hunt for Zero
Point": "All the better then to cloak the sensational
discovery in a multi-layered disinformation operation, to conseal it
behind the ET Myth".
lørdag 14. april 2012
fredag 13. april 2012
News from Hessdalen; UFO-sightings 2012:
Happy announcement number 1:
The live-camera in the Hessdalen automatic station is up and running again. Here you can follow what happens in the "valley of UFOs" from second to second. The live-camera has been down since December, but is finally back.
The camera is very light sensitive, and mounted in the direction of west. In the hours before sunset, , the screen goes black, and it is impossible to see anything. In winter, it is dark at night in Norway, and one is therefore dependent on the moon for it to be bright enough to make observations.
However, it is possible to observe the phenomena live here. I have been lucky enough to see the phenomena repeatedly using this camera.
For example, do like me, have a small window open while you work on something else on your computer, - or download a screen recording program that can record while you do something else, not at home, etc.
The live-camera in the Hessdalen automatic station is up and running again. Here you can follow what happens in the "valley of UFOs" from second to second. The live-camera has been down since December, but is finally back.
Nice view: Hessdalen live-camera. |
The camera is very light sensitive, and mounted in the direction of west. In the hours before sunset, , the screen goes black, and it is impossible to see anything. In winter, it is dark at night in Norway, and one is therefore dependent on the moon for it to be bright enough to make observations.
However, it is possible to observe the phenomena live here. I have been lucky enough to see the phenomena repeatedly using this camera.
For example, do like me, have a small window open while you work on something else on your computer, - or download a screen recording program that can record while you do something else, not at home, etc.
Hessdalen automatic station. |
Happy
announcement number 2:
The Project Hessdalen page where observation reports are published, is updated. So far there are four phenomena reported in 2012:
The Project Hessdalen page where observation reports are published, is updated. So far there are four phenomena reported in 2012:
---
|
Etiketter:
2012,
automatic station,
evidence,
Hessdalen,
news,
observations,
research,
science,
sightings,
UFO
mandag 9. april 2012
Roswell, MJ-12, anti-gravity and "the (nazi) Bell":
Most reports referred
to in books that deal with the 1947 flying saucer/UFO-wave
describes crafts that indicate
advanced jet / rocket technology. However, there are examples of
other, seemingly more advanced things. Some reports describe
extreme speeds, jerky movements, angle turns (non-aerodynamic
maneuvers) climbing as in "stairs", buzzing sound
(hints of high voltage) craft enveloped in an intense flare,
etc.These reports are characterized by a type of field propulsion
/ "anti-gravity" is involved.
Again Schulgens memorandum must be mentioned:
“Nuclear propulsion (atomic energy): Atomic energy engines would probably be unlike any familiar type of engine, altough atomic engines might be employed in combination with any of the above types".
The term "nuclear propulsion" is vague, however. It can mean - and in some cases, probably, it is likely that it means - any field-propulsion (or "anti-gravity") technology that is based on some form of radioactive isotope to provoke these field effects.
My tip is that the UFO phenomenon in 1947 was about a majority of jet-turbine-powered saucer shaped aircrafts (built in lightweight materials) which extraordinary maneuverability and performance were based on eliminating the problem of "the boundary layer" and thus reduce air resistance and friction. In parallel with these existed a set of (probably unstable / unreliable) nuclear-powered vessels, one of which crashed near Roswell.
The Germans worked to achieve energy independence in the third Reich, particularly interesting was alternative "free energy" sources. According to field propulsion and discussions of UFOs, Hans Coler and Karl Schappeler are often mentioned, regarding projects including coils, magnets and rotation.
A MJ-12 document may shed further light on «coils and magnets», - and potential nuclear power to provoke field propulsion («anti-gravity»).
Most of what is said and written about the so-called Majestic 12 documents (MJ-12) is based on the notion that they are either 100% true or 100% hoax. It has been little focus about the very nature of them and what they actually say. My understanding is that some of the documents may contain some truth mixed with some disinfo. In this context, in my opinion, "The White Hot Intelligence Estimate" and especially the second part of the document "technical evaluation (preliminary)" is particularly interesting.The following content is taken directly from the document (quoted from Joseph P. Farrell, Reich of the black sun (2001) and Roswell and the reich (2010):
---
PART II TECHNICAL EVALUATION (PRELIMINARY)
ULAT-1
1. Upon close examination of the exterior surfaces of the craft's fuselage, metallurgists found the skin to be of a ferrous metal white in color. The metal exhibits all the characteristics of high-grade steel. It was determined that the steel was cold-formed and heat-treated. Tensile strength was estimated in excess of 150,000 pounds per square inch. Shear tests give the metal a durability rating about 175,000 pounds per square inch, making the fuselage extremely strong and heat resistant.
2. Static and pressure flow simulaions were impressive. The low
profile ratio of 6-to-l gives the aerodyne a great advantage in
overcoming the restrictions of the boundary layer effect in high
performance operatons.
...
8. The power plant (seeverely damaged) ????????????????
neutronic negine. ????????????????? Detected. Heavy water and
deuterium (light hydrogen) elements appear to be the primary ignitor. A series of coils and heavy magnets connected to the neutronic engine via an oddly arranged group of electrodes (metal not yet identified) appears to be the motive force. One small motor was examined. It is encased in a pure aluminum capsule directly underneath the main engine compartment. There is a small exhaust aperture that has what can by (sic) only described as an helicoid mechanism.
...
10: The follwing elements were analyzed and found to exist in the
small neutronic power plant that was found inside ULAT-1:
a. UF6 in metallic form;
b. Hydrogen-fluoride gas;
c. Water and uranium tetrafluoride;
d. Powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate;
e. Metal similar to lead with a chocolate brown color;
f. U-235 in metallic form;
g. Plastic like material similar to NE 102;
h. Beryllium,
i. Pure aluminum;
h. Thorium isotope material;
j. plutonium powder.
---
Again Schulgens memorandum must be mentioned:
“Nuclear propulsion (atomic energy): Atomic energy engines would probably be unlike any familiar type of engine, altough atomic engines might be employed in combination with any of the above types".
The term "nuclear propulsion" is vague, however. It can mean - and in some cases, probably, it is likely that it means - any field-propulsion (or "anti-gravity") technology that is based on some form of radioactive isotope to provoke these field effects.
My tip is that the UFO phenomenon in 1947 was about a majority of jet-turbine-powered saucer shaped aircrafts (built in lightweight materials) which extraordinary maneuverability and performance were based on eliminating the problem of "the boundary layer" and thus reduce air resistance and friction. In parallel with these existed a set of (probably unstable / unreliable) nuclear-powered vessels, one of which crashed near Roswell.
The Germans worked to achieve energy independence in the third Reich, particularly interesting was alternative "free energy" sources. According to field propulsion and discussions of UFOs, Hans Coler and Karl Schappeler are often mentioned, regarding projects including coils, magnets and rotation.
Hans Colers "Magnetstromapparat". |
A MJ-12 document may shed further light on «coils and magnets», - and potential nuclear power to provoke field propulsion («anti-gravity»).
Most of what is said and written about the so-called Majestic 12 documents (MJ-12) is based on the notion that they are either 100% true or 100% hoax. It has been little focus about the very nature of them and what they actually say. My understanding is that some of the documents may contain some truth mixed with some disinfo. In this context, in my opinion, "The White Hot Intelligence Estimate" and especially the second part of the document "technical evaluation (preliminary)" is particularly interesting.The following content is taken directly from the document (quoted from Joseph P. Farrell, Reich of the black sun (2001) and Roswell and the reich (2010):
---
PART II TECHNICAL EVALUATION (PRELIMINARY)
ULAT-1
1. Upon close examination of the exterior surfaces of the craft's fuselage, metallurgists found the skin to be of a ferrous metal white in color. The metal exhibits all the characteristics of high-grade steel. It was determined that the steel was cold-formed and heat-treated. Tensile strength was estimated in excess of 150,000 pounds per square inch. Shear tests give the metal a durability rating about 175,000 pounds per square inch, making the fuselage extremely strong and heat resistant.
2. Static and pressure flow simulaions were impressive. The low
profile ratio of 6-to-l gives the aerodyne a great advantage in
overcoming the restrictions of the boundary layer effect in high
performance operatons.
...
8. The power plant (seeverely damaged) ????????????????
neutronic negine. ????????????????? Detected. Heavy water and
deuterium (light hydrogen) elements appear to be the primary ignitor. A series of coils and heavy magnets connected to the neutronic engine via an oddly arranged group of electrodes (metal not yet identified) appears to be the motive force. One small motor was examined. It is encased in a pure aluminum capsule directly underneath the main engine compartment. There is a small exhaust aperture that has what can by (sic) only described as an helicoid mechanism.
...
10: The follwing elements were analyzed and found to exist in the
small neutronic power plant that was found inside ULAT-1:
a. UF6 in metallic form;
b. Hydrogen-fluoride gas;
c. Water and uranium tetrafluoride;
d. Powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate;
e. Metal similar to lead with a chocolate brown color;
f. U-235 in metallic form;
g. Plastic like material similar to NE 102;
h. Beryllium,
i. Pure aluminum;
h. Thorium isotope material;
j. plutonium powder.
---
Point 1 and 2 is an echo from Schulgens memo, and emphasizes which
was written regarding Nazi research into new forms of production of
metals, as well as research on "boundary layer control".
Section 8 describes a very
unconventional source of energy - composed of conventional elements
but in an unusual combination: A "neutronic power plant"
apparently "powered" by a bizarre mix of everything from
"powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate" to beryllium
and an unknown / unspecified isotope of thorium in a container with
surrounding series of "coils and heavy magnets."
Coils and magnets are definitely representing "identifiable electronics", but which is of concern here is an "oddly arranged group of Electrodes", - in other words; it is not the technology that is unusual, but the design, arrangement and combination thereof.
Coils and magnets are definitely representing "identifiable electronics", but which is of concern here is an "oddly arranged group of Electrodes", - in other words; it is not the technology that is unusual, but the design, arrangement and combination thereof.
And the description of the
arrangement of the coils, magnets and spherical electronics sounds
suspiciously like Hans Colers "coils" and Schapellers
devices.
The document points, in
other words, not in the direction of alien technology, but exotic,
man-made technology - and further - a unique German
technology.
Point 10 is however the most interesting here.
Remember that this document was published in a publication by Drs.
Robert and Ryan Wood in 1998. Why is this significant? Because the
technological description of this' neutronic power plant "sounds
suspiciously like" the Nazi bell "that used a mysterious"
fuel "code-named" IRR Xerum 525 ". This consisted,
among other things, of thorium and beryllium oxides in addition to
other radioactive materials, which was electromagnetic and mechanical
counter-rotated (american intelligence looking for clues concerning
the German nuclear weapon program found stocks of thorium in massive
quantities when they entered Germany at the end of the war - no one,
today, can explain why the Germans were obsessed of thorium).
The
timing of the publication of the "White Hot Intelligence
Estimate" and its associated documents in 1998, is significant,
because at that time no publication concerning "the Nazi bell"
did exist. The only thing that existed was Igor Witkowskis
(relatively obscure) early articles in Polish language! In other
words, it seems as if "someone" had an extraordinary degree
of "inside knowledge" based on completely different
sources.
It would take too long to go into detail about The
Bell here (I'll save that for later posts), but two of those involved
in the project was Dr. Walter Gerlach, Nobel Prize winner for his
work on spin-polarization in magnetic fields, and specializes in
gravitational physics (and other more obscure topics, such as
"fluorescence of mercury ions in a strong magnetic field",
ie. behavior of a "mercuric plasma") and Dr. Kurt Debus,
electrical engineer with expertise in high voltage and "separation
of magnetic fields" according to Witkowski - and it is from
several sources claimed that the Bell project had - at least as one
of its goals - to investigate aspects concerning gravity, and
potentially develop field propulsion – or anti-gravity - as a
result of this.
Etiketter:
1947 ufo wave,
anti-gravity,
evidence,
MJ-12,
Nazi-UFO,
Roswell,
The Nazi Bell
lørdag 7. april 2012
UFOs and G-forces, - and the 1947 flying saucer-wave again:
Regarding G-forces:
How can people (with known technology) survive the extraordinary acceleration and abrupt maneuvers UFOs often been observed to exercise - which in some cases suggest at least 100 times the G-forces? Most people begin to lose consciousness when approaching 10 to 12 G. ..
This is often mentioned as a "proof" that UFOs must be extraterrestrial, which I disagree on. One accepts that aliens are able to solve the problem of G-forces, but consider it impossible for us?
Besides, it can just as well be remote controlled, unmanned crafts that carries out the "worst" maneuvers?
My main point is that UFOs in 1947, according to the majority of the testimonys as they are reproduced in books that deal with the 47-wave, generally did not perform maneuvers that suggest that such forces were involved.
Claims of great maneuverability came later.
Maybe it's due to:
1: Escalation in the eagerness to describe UFOs incredible maneuverability from 1947 to the present.
2: A technological evolution.
Probably a combination, but I think option 2 is most likely.
During the wave of 1947, UFOs did not perform these fantastic maneuvers. It was reported amazing maneuverability compared to contemporary aircraft technology, but not so exotic that it must represent something extraterrestrial.
ET was obviously not in the mind of the general Schulgen, nor mentioned in any of the earliest documents concerning UFOs by the U.S. Air Force - this came later.
Schulgens memorandum, however, is full of references to German technology and research conducted in Germany during the war and in the years ahead of the war.
http://squib.homestead.com/schulgen.pdf
This tells me that what was observed in 1947, "looked all too familiar" two years after the war ended.
This is especially due to Nazi research on the boundary layer, as well as research on aircrafts with circular design.
Take a look at the document from 1936 I linked to in a previous post; - Wilhelm Kinner: "On wings with circular design" ("Über tragflügel mit kreisförmigen grundriss").
But what about sightings of aliens, some will surely object?
Regarding close encounters, meetings with aliens etc. I think it's important to keep in mind that most UFO sightings do not include observation of pilots / crew.
And in those cases when they are reported to not look like us, the "gray-aliens" and so on, it is important to check the source - reports can be manipulated, a manifestation of disinfo, etc.?
Ps! I do not reject the idea of extraterrestrial life -, and I am not dismissive of that we may have had extraterrestrial visits once or several times in our history. Nevertheless, there are a number of facts that place the roots of the modern UFO phenomenon, that emerged in 1947, to Germany.
How can people (with known technology) survive the extraordinary acceleration and abrupt maneuvers UFOs often been observed to exercise - which in some cases suggest at least 100 times the G-forces? Most people begin to lose consciousness when approaching 10 to 12 G. ..
This is often mentioned as a "proof" that UFOs must be extraterrestrial, which I disagree on. One accepts that aliens are able to solve the problem of G-forces, but consider it impossible for us?
Besides, it can just as well be remote controlled, unmanned crafts that carries out the "worst" maneuvers?
My main point is that UFOs in 1947, according to the majority of the testimonys as they are reproduced in books that deal with the 47-wave, generally did not perform maneuvers that suggest that such forces were involved.
Claims of great maneuverability came later.
Maybe it's due to:
1: Escalation in the eagerness to describe UFOs incredible maneuverability from 1947 to the present.
2: A technological evolution.
Probably a combination, but I think option 2 is most likely.
During the wave of 1947, UFOs did not perform these fantastic maneuvers. It was reported amazing maneuverability compared to contemporary aircraft technology, but not so exotic that it must represent something extraterrestrial.
ET was obviously not in the mind of the general Schulgen, nor mentioned in any of the earliest documents concerning UFOs by the U.S. Air Force - this came later.
Schulgens memorandum, however, is full of references to German technology and research conducted in Germany during the war and in the years ahead of the war.
http://squib.homestead.com/schulgen.pdf
This tells me that what was observed in 1947, "looked all too familiar" two years after the war ended.
This is especially due to Nazi research on the boundary layer, as well as research on aircrafts with circular design.
Take a look at the document from 1936 I linked to in a previous post; - Wilhelm Kinner: "On wings with circular design" ("Über tragflügel mit kreisförmigen grundriss").
But what about sightings of aliens, some will surely object?
Regarding close encounters, meetings with aliens etc. I think it's important to keep in mind that most UFO sightings do not include observation of pilots / crew.
And in those cases when they are reported to not look like us, the "gray-aliens" and so on, it is important to check the source - reports can be manipulated, a manifestation of disinfo, etc.?
Ps! I do not reject the idea of extraterrestrial life -, and I am not dismissive of that we may have had extraterrestrial visits once or several times in our history. Nevertheless, there are a number of facts that place the roots of the modern UFO phenomenon, that emerged in 1947, to Germany.
Etiketter:
1947 ufo wave,
aliens,
evidence,
flying saucers,
g forces,
Nazi-UFO,
Roswell
torsdag 5. april 2012
Hessdalen/Drivdalen UFO-video; proof of solid object?
Forty minutes long
recording of UFOs taken in Drivdalen, Norway, a few miles south-west
of Hessdalen.
The recording was made 18 January 2001.
To begin with, it is one light. Eventually, two lights - and at the end, we see three lights in a triangle formation.
The most remarkable aspect of the recording, however, is when the light dims, and we apparently can see what is under the luminous surface.
In the beginning we see a bright, color-changing ball:
Later, the "ball" seems to "open" up.
Eventually, the light turns off, and we are able to see that it is a solid object behind the luminous surface.
---
"A fundamental result which was ascertained directly on the field during two intensive
scientific missions, is just that the Hessdalen phenomenology is characterized by two well-
distinguished aspects:
1: luminous orbs for which an external plasma appearance has been ascertained, but with highly anomalous characteristics both thermodynamically and morphologically,
2: a slender but significant minority of objects which possess sharp characteristics of solidity.
This double way in which the learnt phenomenology appears can be interpreted only in two alternative ways:
Anyway it must be reminded that, by assuming that the second option is taken into account, well-known laws of radiation physics say very clearly that the instrumental verification of the plasma nature of a given phenomenon, is not sufficient to demonstrate that the phenomenon is a plasma entirely, but only that his external surface (or: photosphere) behaves like a plasma which, by its
nature, is able to hide all what exists inside it."
Does this footage represent what's inside a Hessdalen "plasma" ball?
I have been in contact with the head of Project Hessdalen, Erling Strand, at the Østfold university college regarding the recording, and asked for his opinion. He pointed out that we do not know in which hdirection of the sky this was filmed, and that we therefore cann't exclude the possibility that the luminous object at times may have been behind trees or the like. Strand does not exclude, in other words, that the portions of the recording where the light looks like an object, are due to that the light is partially hidden behind a tree.
For this reason, the footage can't prove anything, but in my opinion - and probably anyone who studies it, - it is reasonably unlikely that we are looking at a light (planet?) that periodically moves behind trees here.
The recording was made 18 January 2001.
To begin with, it is one light. Eventually, two lights - and at the end, we see three lights in a triangle formation.
The most remarkable aspect of the recording, however, is when the light dims, and we apparently can see what is under the luminous surface.
In the beginning we see a bright, color-changing ball:
Later, the "ball" seems to "open" up.
Eventually, the light turns off, and we are able to see that it is a solid object behind the luminous surface.
---
"A fundamental result which was ascertained directly on the field during two intensive
scientific missions, is just that the Hessdalen phenomenology is characterized by two well-
distinguished aspects:
1: luminous orbs for which an external plasma appearance has been ascertained, but with highly anomalous characteristics both thermodynamically and morphologically,
2: a slender but significant minority of objects which possess sharp characteristics of solidity.
·
like
an overlap of two phenomena with sharply different characteristics,
or
·
like
two sharply different behaviours of the same phenomenon.
Anyway it must be reminded that, by assuming that the second option is taken into account, well-known laws of radiation physics say very clearly that the instrumental verification of the plasma nature of a given phenomenon, is not sufficient to demonstrate that the phenomenon is a plasma entirely, but only that his external surface (or: photosphere) behaves like a plasma which, by its
nature, is able to hide all what exists inside it."
--
We can’t see
what’s inside a plasma, in the same way as we can’t see what’s inside the sun…
Does this footage represent what's inside a Hessdalen "plasma" ball?
I have been in contact with the head of Project Hessdalen, Erling Strand, at the Østfold university college regarding the recording, and asked for his opinion. He pointed out that we do not know in which hdirection of the sky this was filmed, and that we therefore cann't exclude the possibility that the luminous object at times may have been behind trees or the like. Strand does not exclude, in other words, that the portions of the recording where the light looks like an object, are due to that the light is partially hidden behind a tree.
For this reason, the footage can't prove anything, but in my opinion - and probably anyone who studies it, - it is reasonably unlikely that we are looking at a light (planet?) that periodically moves behind trees here.
onsdag 4. april 2012
Hessdalen automatic station, and a black "stick":
Today's post might help
to show some of the wide range in what has been seen and still is
being seen, in Hessdalen. This sighting was done 23 December,
2002.
From Project Hessdalens web page:
Date: 12/23/2002 Time: 5:07 P.M. Place: Vårhus in Hessdalen
Witness: Bjarne and Bjorn Lillevold.
"The blue box" is the "brain" of Project Hessdalen, and the automatic measurement station. Here are the computers that perform various measurements located, and all the cameras and antennas are mounted here. Apparently, the UFO phenomenon, whether it is man-made or extra terrestrial, makes its own research and measurements “in return”...?
Have a look at the observation reports located on the ProjectHessdalen website.
From Project Hessdalens web page:
Date: 12/23/2002 Time: 5:07 P.M. Place: Vårhus in Hessdalen
Witness: Bjarne and Bjorn Lillevold.
"The blue box" is the "brain" of Project Hessdalen, and the automatic measurement station. Here are the computers that perform various measurements located, and all the cameras and antennas are mounted here. Apparently, the UFO phenomenon, whether it is man-made or extra terrestrial, makes its own research and measurements “in return”...?
Have a look at the observation reports located on the ProjectHessdalen website.
mandag 2. april 2012
Sound phenomena as well in Hessdalen; evidence of underground (military) base?
Taken from Haviks book (the UFO phenomenon, 1987):
---
"Early in the period after 1981, a few people at Øyungen heard sounds which resembled a train passing through a tunnel just below where they stood. Apparently, a "train" passed by from one end to the other, underground where they were. They got scared, and went home.
Later, it is mainly “thunder-like" sounds which have been heard. Today, no explanation is found for these sounds.
On 6. September 1984, two people heard deep roars at 09.18, 15.25 and 15.33. They came from the north-east.
On 7. September the same year, double “explosion-like" sounds were heard on the west side of mount Romundhaugen at 19.55. Later sounds were heard around Romundhaugen, as if the roar moved around the mountain.
If these sound phenomena in any way are related to the light phenomena, they will possibly have some connection with geological 'activity', and then both lights and sound phenomena should be a natural part of this. One has not been able to prove anything in favor of this theory yet."
---
My mind goes inevitable
to what I've read about regarding deep,
underground military bases (dumbs), and underground tunnel systems in
both the United States and Europe - as in a military context can be
traced back to Nazi Germany and the vast underground complexes which
was built in Germany during ww2.
Are there similar underground facilities in the Hessdalen area?
Are there similar underground facilities in the Hessdalen area?
Etiketter:
DUMB,
Hessdalen,
sound phenomena,
UFO,
underground base
Abonner på:
Innlegg (Atom)