lørdag 14. april 2012

The Roswell-crash, majestic 12 and nazi-UFOs (the nazi bell?):

When I nag about the Majestic-12 documents - even though they are questionable documents that have been "leaked", and we do not know the source - it is because I share Joseph P.Farrell's view p. 285

that they possess:
1: An authentic level, where the technical descriptions of the Roswell wreckage are summarized. (Here it is a gap between the description of the technology and what one would expect from the descriptions of a technology of extraterrestrial origin. Conversely, there exists detailed parallels between the technology as it is described, and various "black projects" from Nazi Germany).

2: A level of
disinformation where the emerging "ET explanation" forms a deep "cover layer" of disinfo behind the official explanation about a crashed weather / Project Mogul balloon.

In this context it is worth mentioning another Majestic 12 document, «The 16. July 1947 Air Accident Report by General Nathan Twining toHeadquarters».


The MJ-12 document I wrote about in my previous post, was from September 1947, while this one is from July, and then immediately after the crashed occurred:



---

1. As ordered by Presidential directive, dated 9 July 1947, apreliminary investigation of a recovered "Flying Disc" and remains of a possible second disc, was conducted by the senior staff of this command. The data furnished in this report was provided by the engineering staff personenel of T-2 and aircraft laboratory, Engineering Division T-3. Additional data was supplied by the scientific personnel of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CIT and the Army Air Forces Scientific Advisory Group, headed by Dr. Theodore von Karman. Further analysis was conducted by personnel from Research and Development.

2. It is the collective view of this investigative body, that the aircraft recovered by the Army and Air Force units near Victorio Peak and Socorro, New Mexico, are not of US manufacture for the following reasons:

a. The circular disc-shaped "planform" design does not resemble any design currently under development by thiscommand nor of any Navy project.

b. The lack of any external propulsion system, power plant, intake, exhaust either for propeller or jet propulsion, warrants this view.

c. The inability of the German scientists from Fort Bliss and White Sands Proving Ground to make a positive identification of a secret German V weapon out of these discs. Though thepossibility that the Russians have managed to develop such a craft, remains. The lack of any markings, ID numbers orinstructions in Cyrillic, has placed serious doubt in the minds of many, that the objects recovered are not of Russian manufacture either.

d. Upon examination of the interior of the craft, a compartment exhibiting a possible atomic engine was discovered. At least this is the opinion of Dr. Oppenheimer (sic) and Dr. vonKarman. A possibility exists that part of the craft itself comprises the propulsion system, thus allowing the reactor to function as a heat exchanger and permitting the storage of energy into a substance for later use. This may allow the converting of mass into energy, unlike the release of energy of our atomic bombs. The description of the power room is as follows:

(1) A doughnut shaped tube approximately thirty-five feet in diameter, made of what appears to be a plastic material, surrounding a central core (see sketch in Tab 1) This tube was translucent, approximately one inch this (sic),The tube appeared to be filled with a large rod centered inside the tube, was wrapped in a coil of what appears to be copper material, ran through the circumference of the tube. This may be the reactor control mechanism or a storage battery. There were no moving parts decernable (sic) within the power room nor in MISSING LINE HERE.

(2) This activation of a electrical (sic) potential is believed to be the primary power to the reactor, though it is only a theory at present. Just how a heavy water reactor functions in this environment is unknown.

(3) Underneath the power plant, was discovered a ballturret, approximately ten feet in diameter. This turret was encompassed by a series of gears that has a unusual (sic) ratio not known by any of our engineers. On the underside of the turret were four circular cavities, coated with some smooth material not identified. These cavities are symetrical (sic) but seem to be movable. Just how is not known. The movement of the turret coincides with the dome-shaped copula compartment above the power room. It is believed that the main prorpulsion system is a Modeless turbine, similar to current development now underway at AMC and the Mogul Project. A possible theory was devised by Dr. August Steinhof, Dr. Wernher von Braun (sic) and Dr. Theodore von Karman as the craft moves through the air, it somehow draws the oxygen from the atomsphere and by a (sic, et passim) induction process, generates a atomic fusion reaction (see TAB 2). The air outside the craft would thus be ionized, thus propelling the craft forward. Coupled with the circular air foil for lift, the craft would presumably have an unlimited range and air speed This may account for the reported absence of any noise and the apparent blue flame often associated with rapid acceleration.

(4) On the Deck of the power room there are what resembles typewriter keys, possibly reactor/powerplant controls. There were no conventional electronics not (sic) wiring to be seen connecting these controls to the propulsion turret.

e. There is a flight deck located inside the copula section. It is round and domed at the top. The absence of canopy, observation windows/blisters, or any optical projection, lends support to the opinion that this craft is either guided by remote viewing or is remotely controlled.

(1) A semi-circular photo-tube array (possibly television).

(2) Crew compartments were hermetically sealed via a solidification process.

(3) No weld marks, rivets or soldered joints.

(4) Craft components appear to be molded and pressed into perfect fit.


---
Some key points:

If the craft was of extraterrestrial origin - full of ultra-advanced ET technology - why were the three German (paperclip) rocket scientists called in to inspect the wreck? Thinking of U.S. secret projects' potential gain, - it would probably have been of interest to shield any ET technology from the Germans (and their possible contacts) two years after the war ended? So in other words, when the Germans were called in to inspect the remainings of the craft ( possible identification) it may be taken as an indication that the technology seemed man-made and of German origin?

Although the Germans were unable to identify the technology as something associated with German V-weapons, they were able to propose a rather radical form of propultion mechanism
for the craft, and consequently they must at least have had some suspicions about its origin?

Nearly all technological descriptions in the document has an "man-made" character, a plastic tube, ca. 2.5 cm. in diameter, filled with a substance that seems to be ... water, a coil ... copper material ...


Furthermore, there is talk of a heavy water reactor, and that the German paperclip scientists already are thinking of a nuclear fusion reactor rather than a fission reactor. Thinking of the equipment described, it seems a process something like cold fusion(!).

Something resembling typewriter keys are mentioned in connection with the description of a possible "power plant" control, and further a "ball turret" componenet is mentioned, accompanied by a series of gears (!) With an "unusual ratio", unknown to the Americans .

All in all, there is very little in "the air accident report" document that suggests something extraterrestrial, but rather very much pointing in the direction of technology that the Nazis tried to perfect during the war.

As mentioned previously, - General Sculgen and his intelligence agents speculated about the possibility of nuclear propulsion, - in other words
nuclear-powered UFOs in 1947.

The paperclip experts, Steinhof, Von Braun and Karman, describes a type of propulsion where oxygen from the atmosphere is drawn into the craft when it moves through the air, and also a process in which a nuclear fusion reaction is formed, so that the air outside the craft is ionized and thus drives the vessel forward.

As previously mentioned, it is my opinion that the term nuclear-propulsion is similar to field propulsion (“anti-gravity”) when the technology is based on a radioactive isotope to provoke these field effects.


In conclusion;

It may appear that both the official government documents - which of course are undoubtedly authentic, (represented here by Schulgens collection of intelligence memorandum) - and also the more dubious Majestic 12 documents - which probably contains a bit of authentic information mixed with a portion disinfo - largely supports the claim that the UFO phenomenon is of German origin.

If any independent Nazi "black project research team(s)" survived the war, and if the Roswell crash provide adequate evidence that such was the case, one can hardly imagine the shock waves in the Pentagon two years after the war ended ...

As Nick Cook puts it in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point": "All the better then to cloak the sensational discovery in a multi-layered disinformation operation, to conseal it behind the ET Myth".


fredag 13. april 2012

News from Hessdalen; UFO-sightings 2012:

Happy announcement number 1:
The live-camera in the Hessdalen automatic station is up and running again. Here you can follow what happens in the "valley of UFOs" from second to second. The live-camera has been down since December, but is finally back.


Nice view: Hessdalen live-camera.

The camera is very light sensitive, and mounted in the direction of west. In the hours before sunset, , the screen goes black, and it is impossible to see anything. In winter, it is dark at night in Norway, and one is therefore dependent on the moon for it to be bright enough to make observations.

However, it
is possible to observe the phenomena live here. I have been lucky enough to see the phenomena repeatedly using this camera.

For example, do like me, have a small window open while you work on something else on your computer, - or download a screen recording program that can record while you do something else, not at home, etc.


Hessdalen automatic station.

Happy announcement number 2:
The Project Hessdalen page where observation reports are published, is updated. So far there are four phenomena reported in 2012:

---

Date: 01.03.2012 Time: 08:30 P.M Place: Lake Hersjøen, Hessdalen
Ole Jacob was driving a snowmobile on lake Hersjøen, together with his son Jacob

(11 years) and his niece Kristin (13 years). They saw a green light coming from the
east, moving down with an angle, in front of, and just south of mount Brattbekken, i
n the west. It disappeared when it was in the hillside. It disappeared when it was
below the horizon. The weather was calm, a few clouds and the themperature was - 2°C.

Date: 25.02.2012 Time: at about 07:20 P.M Place: Fjellheim parking, Hessdalen
The observers were at the parking place, when they saw a light in direction northeast.

The light was seen two times during a 5 minutes periode, and it lasted about 10 seconds
each time. During the first observation, the light split in two.

Date: 19.02.2012 Time: between 01:00 and 02:00 A.M Place: Fjellheim parking,
Hessdalen
The observers were at the parking place, in the middle of the night, due to recording of a film.

They saw a light phenomenon in direction west/northwest, just above mount Skarvan. They
saw the light three times, each with a duration of about 5 to 10 seconds. It was above the horizon.

Date: 18.02.2012 Time:11:40 P.M Place: Grøtådalen, Hessdalen
Anngerd was sitting on a sledge behind a snowmobile, when they were driving back         

home from Grøtådalen. She saw a light in direction north/northwest. Estimated distance
was to the light was beneath 1000m, and it was underneath the horizon. The light looked
like sparks/ lines of light / rocket, which was standing still, just above the ground. She saw
the light just some seconds, because the snowmobile was driving into the farm, and something
did block the line of sight. She moved to a place on her farm, where she could see it, but then
it was gone.
---
Source: Project Hessdalen home page.


mandag 9. april 2012

Roswell, MJ-12, anti-gravity and "the (nazi) Bell":

Most reports referred to in books that deal with the 1947 flying saucer/UFO-wave describes crafts that indicate advanced jet / rocket technology. However, there are examples of other, seemingly more advanced things. Some reports describe extreme speeds, jerky movements, angle turns (non-aerodynamic maneuvers) climbing as in "stairs", buzzing sound (hints of high voltage) craft enveloped in an intense flare, etc.These reports are characterized by a type of field propulsion / "anti-gravity" is involved.

Again Schulgens memorandum must be mentioned:


“Nuclear propulsion (atomic energy): Atomic energy engines would probably be unlike any familiar type of engine, altough atomic engines might be employed in combination with any of the above types".

The term "nuclear propulsion" is vague, however. It can mean - and in some cases, probably, it is likely that it means - any field-propulsion (or "anti-gravity") technology that is based on some form of radioactive isotope to provoke these field effects.

My tip is that the UFO phenomenon in 1947 was about a majority of jet-turbine-powered saucer shaped aircrafts (built in lightweight materials) which extraordinary maneuverability and performance were based on eliminating the problem of "the boundary layer" and thus reduce air resistance and friction.
In parallel with these existed a set of (probably unstable / unreliable) nuclear-powered vessels, one of which crashed near Roswell.

The Germans worked to achieve energy independence in the third Reich, particularly interesting was alternative "free energy" sources. According to field propulsion and discussions of UFOs, Hans Coler and Karl Schappeler are often mentioned, regarding projects including coils, magnets and rotation.

Hans Colers "Magnetstromapparat".


A MJ-12 document may shed further light on «coils and magnets», - and potential nuclear power to provoke field propulsion («anti-gravity»).

Most of what is said and written about the so-called Majestic 12 documents (MJ-12) is based on the notion that they are either 100% true or 100% hoax. It has been little focus about the very nature of them and what they actually say. My understanding is that some of the documents may contain some truth mixed with some disinfo. In this context, in my opinion, "The White Hot Intelligence Estimate" and especially the second part of the document "technical evaluation (preliminary)" is particularly interesting.The following content is taken directly from the document (quoted from Joseph P. Farrell, Reich of the black sun (2001) and Roswell and the reich (2010):

---

PART II TECHNICAL EVALUATION (PRELIMINARY)
ULAT-1

1. Upon close examination of the exterior surfaces of the craft's fuselage, metallurgists found the skin to be of a ferrous metal white in color. The metal exhibits all the characteristics of high-grade steel. It was determined that the steel was cold-formed and heat-treated. Tensile strength was estimated in excess of 150,000 pounds per square inch. Shear tests give the metal a durability rating about 175,000 pounds per square inch, making the fuselage extremely strong and heat resistant.
2. Static and pressure flow simulaions were impressive. The low
profile ratio of 6-to-l gives the aerodyne a great advantage in
overcoming the restrictions of the boundary layer effect in high
performance operatons.

...

8. The power plant (seeverely damaged) ????????????????
neutronic negine. ????????????????? Detected. Heavy water and
deuterium (light hydrogen) elements appear to be the primary ignitor. A series of coils and heavy magnets connected to the neutronic engine via an oddly arranged group of electrodes (metal not yet identified) appears to be the motive force. One small motor was examined. It is encased in a pure aluminum capsule directly underneath the main engine compartment. There is a small exhaust aperture that has what can by (sic) only described as an helicoid mechanism.

...

10: The follwing elements were analyzed and found to exist in the
small neutronic power plant that was found inside ULAT-1:

a. UF6 in metallic form;
b. Hydrogen-fluoride gas;
c. Water and uranium tetrafluoride;
d. Powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate;
e. Metal similar to lead with a chocolate brown color;
f. U-235 in metallic form;
g. Plastic like material similar to NE 102;
h. Beryllium,
i. Pure aluminum;
h. Thorium isotope material;
j. plutonium powder.


---

Point 1 and 2 is an echo from Schulgens memo, and emphasizes which was written regarding Nazi research into new forms of production of metals, as well as research on "boundary layer control".

Section 8 describes a very unconventional source of energy - composed of conventional elements but in an unusual combination: A "neutronic power plant" apparently "powered" by a bizarre mix of everything from "powdered magnesium and potassium chlorate" to beryllium and an unknown / unspecified isotope of thorium in a container with surrounding series of "coils and heavy magnets."
Coils and magnets are definitely representing "identifiable electronics", but which is of concern here is an "oddly arranged group of Electrodes", - in other words; it is not the technology that is unusual, but the design, arrangement and combination thereof.

And the description of the arrangement of the coils, magnets and spherical electronics sounds suspiciously like Hans Colers "coils" and Schapellers devices.

The document points, in other words, not in the direction of alien technology, but exotic, man-made technology - and further - a unique German technology.

Point 10 is however the most interesting here. Remember that this document was published in a publication by Drs. Robert and Ryan Wood in 1998. Why is this significant? Because the technological description of this' neutronic power plant "sounds suspiciously like" the Nazi bell "that used a mysterious" fuel "code-named" IRR Xerum 525 ". This consisted, among other things, of thorium and beryllium oxides in addition to other radioactive materials, which was electromagnetic and mechanical counter-rotated (american intelligence looking for clues concerning the German nuclear weapon program found stocks of thorium in massive quantities when they entered Germany at the end of the war - no one, today, can explain why the Germans were obsessed of thorium).

Illustration: The Bell (Die Glocke)

The timing of the publication of the "White Hot Intelligence Estimate" and its associated documents in 1998, is significant, because at that time no publication concerning "the Nazi bell" did exist. The only thing that existed was Igor Witkowskis (relatively obscure) early articles in Polish language! In other words, it seems as if "someone" had an extraordinary degree of "inside knowledge" based on completely different sources.

It would take too long to go into detail about The Bell here (I'll save that for later posts), but two of those involved in the project was Dr. Walter Gerlach, Nobel Prize winner for his work on spin-polarization in magnetic fields, and specializes in gravitational physics (and other more obscure topics, such as "fluorescence of mercury ions in a strong magnetic field", ie. behavior of a "mercuric plasma") and Dr. Kurt Debus, electrical engineer with expertise in high voltage and "separation of magnetic fields" according to Witkowski - and it is from several sources claimed that the Bell project had - at least as one of its goals - to investigate aspects concerning gravity, and potentially develop field propulsion – or anti-gravity - as a result of this.




lørdag 7. april 2012

UFOs and G-forces, - and the 1947 flying saucer-wave again:

Regarding G-forces:

How can people (with
known technology) survive the extraordinary acceleration and abrupt maneuvers UFOs often been observed to exercise - which in some cases suggest at least 100 times the G-forces? Most people begin to lose consciousness when approaching 10 to 12 G. ..

This is often mentioned as a "proof" that UFOs must be extraterrestrial, which I disagree on. One accepts that aliens are able to solve the problem of G-forces, but consider it impossible for us?
Besides, it can just as well be remote controlled, unmanned crafts that carries out the "worst" maneuvers?

My main point is that UFOs in 1947, according to the majority of the testimonys as they are reproduced in books that deal with the 47-wave, generally did not perform maneuvers that suggest that such forces were involved.

Claims of great maneuverability came later.

Maybe it's due to:

1: Escalation in the eagerness to describe UFOs incredible maneuverability from 1947 to the present.

2: A technological evolution.

Probably a combination, but I think option 2 is most likely.





During the wave of 1947, UFOs did not perform these fantastic maneuvers. It was reported amazing maneuverability compared to contemporary aircraft technology, but not so exotic that it must represent something extraterrestrial.

ET was obviously not in the mind of the general Schulgen, nor mentioned in any of the earliest documents concerning UFOs by the U.S. Air Force - this came later.

Schulgens memorandum, however, is full of references to German technology and research conducted in Germany during the war and in the years ahead of the war.

http://squib.homestead.com/schulgen.pdf

This tells me that what was observed in 1947, "looked all too familiar" two years after the war ended.

This is especially due to Nazi research on the boundary layer, as well as research on aircrafts with circular design.

Take a look at the document from 1936 I linked to in a previous post; - Wilhelm Kinner: "On wings with circular design" ("Über tragflügel mit kreisförmigen grundriss").

But what about sightings of aliens, some will surely object?

Regarding close encounters, meetings with aliens etc. I think it's important to keep in mind that most UFO sightings do not include observation of pilots / crew.

And in those cases when they are reported to not look like us, the "gray-aliens" and so on, it is important to check the source - reports can be manipulated, a manifestation of disinfo, etc.?

Ps! I do not reject the idea of ​​extraterrestrial life -, and I am not dismissive of that we may have had extraterrestrial visits once or several times in our history. Nevertheless, there are a number of facts that place the roots of the modern UFO phenomenon, that emerged in 1947, to Germany.


torsdag 5. april 2012

Hessdalen/Drivdalen UFO-video; proof of solid object?

Forty minutes long recording of UFOs taken in Drivdalen, Norway, a few miles south-west of Hessdalen.




The recording was made 18 January 2001.




To begin with, it is one light. Eventually, two lights - and at the end, we see three lights in a triangle formation.


The most remarkable aspect of the recording, however, is when the light dims, and we apparently can see what is under the luminous surface.

In the beginning we see a bright, color-changing ball:

Later, the "ball" seems to "open" up.


Eventually, the light turnes off, and we are able to see that it is a solid object behind the luminous surface.




Let's recap what PhD. astrophysicist MassimoTeodorani have said in this connection:
---
The Hessdalen Phenomenology is characterized by two well-distinguished aspects:


1: The very most luminous part of apparently intellectual orbs for which an external plasma appearance has been ascertained, but with highly anomalous characteristics bothering thermodynamically and morphologically,

2: a slender but significant minority of objects possess sharp characteristics of solidity. This double way in which the learnt phenomenology can be interpreted appears only in two alternative ways: or as an overlap of two phenomena with sharply different characteristics, or as two sharply different behaviors of the same phenomenon. Anyway it must be reminded that, by assuming that the second option is taken into account, well-known laws of radiation physics say very clearly That the instrumental verification of the plasma nature of a given phenomenon, is not sufficient two demonstrate that the phenomenon is entirely a plasma, but only that historical external surface (or: photosphere) behave like a plasma which, by its nature, is comfortable to hide all what exists inside it.


Does this footage represent what's inside a Hessdalen "plasma" ball?

It goes with the story that Project Hessdalen has an edited version of the recording available on its website. In the edited version, all of the most interesting parts are edited out (the parts where you can clearly see that it is a solid object, - not gas/plasma).

I have been in contact with the head of Project Hessdalen, Erling Strand, at the Østfold college regarding the recording, and asked for his opinion. He pointed out that we do not know in which height in the sky this was filmed, and that we therefore can not exclude the possibility that the luminous object at times may have been behind trees or the like. Strand does not exclude, in other words, that the portions of the recording where the light looks like an object, are due to that the light is partially hidden behind a tree.

For this reason, the footage can't prove anything, but in my opinion - and probably anyone who studies it, - it is reasonably unlikely that we are looking at a light (planet?) that periodically moves behind trees here.


Strand emphasizes that the recording is extremely interesting.

onsdag 4. april 2012

Hessdalen automatic station, and a black "stick":

Today's post might help to show some of the wide range in what has been observed, and still is being observed, in Hessdalen. This observation was made 23 December, 2002.

From Project Hessdalens web page:

Date: 12/23/2002 Time: 5:07 P.M. Place: Vårhus in Hessdalen
Observer: Bjarne and Bjorn Lillevold.



Bjørn and Bjarne were working with a car out on the yard at home. They suddenly
became aware of a big black vertical "stick", just above the automatic station.
The lower part of the "stick" did make a blue-green flash now and then. It could go
minutes between each flash. It moved slowly towards south, in direction Rognsåsjøen.
It disappeared behind the mountain 15 minutes later.
Ref. Bjarne Lillevold.
Illustration.
 
"The blue box" is the "brain" of Project Hessdalen, and the automatic measurement station. Here are the computers that perform various measurements placed, and all the cameras and antennas are mounted here. Apparently, the UFO phenomenon, whether it is man-made or alien, makes its own research and observations “in return”.

Take a look at the observation reports located on the ProjectHessdalen website.


mandag 2. april 2012

Sound phenomena as well in Hessdalen; evidence of underground (military) base?


Taken from Haviks book (the UFO phenomenon, 1987):

---

"Early in the period after 1981, a few people at Øyungen heard sounds which resembled a train passing through a tunnel just below where they stood. Apparently, a "train" passed by from one end to the other, underground where they were. They got scared, and went home.

Later, it is mainly “thunder-like" sounds which have been heard. Today, no explanation is found for these sounds.

On 6. September 1984, two people heard deep roars at 09.18, 15.25 and 15.33. They came from the north-east.

On 7. September the same year, double “explosion-like" sounds were heard on the west side of mount Romundhaugen at 19.55. Later sounds were heard around Romundhaugen, as if the roar moved around the mountain.

If these sound phenomena in any way are related to the light phenomena, they will possibly have some connection with geological 'activity', and then both lights and sound phenomena should be a natural part of this. One has not been able to prove anything in favor of this theory yet."


---

My mind goes inevitable to what I've read about regarding deep, underground military bases (dumbs), and underground tunnel systems in both the United States and Europe - as in a military context can be traced back to Nazi Germany and the vast underground complexes which was built in Germany during ww2.
Are there similar underground facilities in the Hessdalen area?